An Experiment in Candidate Selection
- (pp. 1575-1612)
AbstractAre ordinary citizens or political party leaders better positioned to select candidates? While the American primary system lets citizens choose, most democracies rely instead on party officials to appoint or nominate candidates. The consequences of these distinct design choices are unclear: while officials are often better informed about candidate qualifications, they may value traits, like party loyalty or willingness to pay for the nomination, at odds with identifying the best performer. We partnered with both major political parties in Sierra Leone to experimentally vary how much say voters have in selecting Parliamentary candidates. Estimates suggest that more democratic procedures increase the likelihood that parties select voters' most preferred candidates and favor candidates with stronger records of public goods provision.
CitationCasey, Katherine, Abou Bakarr Kamara, and Niccoló F. Meriggi. 2021. "An Experiment in Candidate Selection." American Economic Review, 111 (5): 1575-1612. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20200125
- D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- H41 Public Goods
- O17 Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements