This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Economic Review: Insights
  4. December 2022
  5. Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections

Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections

  • Gordon B. Dahl
  • Runjing Lu
  • William Mullins
American Economic Review: Insights
vol. 4, no. 4, December 2022
(pp. 473-90)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

Changes in political leadership drive sharp changes in public policy and partisan beliefs about the future. We exploit the surprise 2016 election of Trump to identify the effects of a shift in political power on one of the most consequential household decisions: whether to have a child. Republican-leaning counties experience a sharp and persistent increase in fertility relative to Democratic counties, a shift amounting to 1.2–2.2 percent of the national fertility rate. In addition, Hispanics see fertility fall relative to non-Hispanics, especially compared to rural or evangelical Whites.

Citation

Dahl, Gordon B., Runjing Lu, and William Mullins. 2022. "Partisan Fertility and Presidential Elections." American Economic Review: Insights, 4 (4): 473-90. DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20210485

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
  • J13 Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth