This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Economic Review
  4. May 2015
  5. Why Do Firms Have "Purpose"? The Firm's Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation

Why Do Firms Have "Purpose"? The Firm's Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation

  • Rebecca Henderson
  • Eric Van den Steen
American Economic Review
vol. 105, no. 5, May 2015
(pp. 326-30)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

This article develops a theory in which a firm's adoption of a prosocial purpose can increase profitability by strengthening employees' reputation and identity—leading to higher effort and lower wages—as long as implementing purpose is costly with respect to direct monetary payoffs. Employees who value prosocial action will select into firms with a social purpose, which then become a visible carrier for these employees' identity and reputation.

Citation

Henderson, Rebecca, and Eric Van den Steen. 2015. "Why Do Firms Have "Purpose"? The Firm's Role as a Carrier of Identity and Reputation." American Economic Review, 105 (5): 326-30. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151072

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • D21 Firm Behavior: Theory
  • J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
  • L25 Firm Performance: Size, Diversification, and Scope
  • M14 Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility