The phenomenon of choice shifts in group decision-making has received attention in the social psychology literature. Faced with a risky group decision, individuals appear to support more extreme choices relative to those they would make on their own. This paper demonstrates that from a decision-theoretic perspective, choice shifts are intimately connected to failures of expected utility theory. In the model studied here, the Allais paradox is equivalent to a well-studied configuration of choice shifts. Thus, our results marry two well-known behavioral regularities, one in individual decision theory and another in the social psychology of groups. (JEL D71, D81)
Eliaz, Kfir, Debraj Ray and Ronny Razin.
2006."Choice Shifts in Groups: A Decision-Theoretic Basis."American Economic Review,
96(4): 1321-1332.DOI: 10.1257/aer.96.4.1321