Time versus State in Insurance: Experimental Evidence from Contract Farming in Kenya
American Economic Review
vol. 108,
no. 12, December 2018
(pp. 3778-3813)
Abstract
The gains from insurance arise from the transfer of income across states. Yet, by requiring that the premium be paid upfront, standard insurance products also transfer income across time. We show that this intertemporal transfer can help explain low insurance demand, especially among the poor, and in a randomized control trial in Kenya we test a crop insurance product which removes it. The product is interlinked with a contract farming scheme: as with other inputs, the buyer of the crop offers the insurance and deducts the premium from farmer revenues at harvest time. The take-up rate for pay-at-harvest insurance is 72 percent, compared to 5 percent for the standard pay-up-front contract, and the difference is largest among poorer farmers. Additional experiments and outcomes provide evidence on the role of liquidity constraints, present bias, and counterparty risk, and find that enabling farmers to commit to pay the premium just one month later increases demand by 21 percentage points.Citation
Casaburi, Lorenzo, and Jack Willis. 2018. "Time versus State in Insurance: Experimental Evidence from Contract Farming in Kenya." American Economic Review, 108 (12): 3778-3813. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20171526Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- G22 Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
- I32 Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
- O13 Economic Development: Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
- O16 Economic Development: Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
- Q12 Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
- Q14 Agricultural Finance