Negative Returns to Seniority and Job Mobility across the Program Quality Distribution: Are Top Public PhD-Granting Programs Different?
American Economic Review
vol. 101,
no. 3, May 2011
(pp. 466-70)
Abstract
We analyze a unique data set containing annual salary and detailed job and publication histories for a sample of 1,009 faculty members drawn from 53 public Ph.D.-granting economics departments. Empirical results suggest that all else equal: (1) statistically significant negative returns to seniority exist within lower-ranked but not top 15 programs; (2) more frequent movers observe statistically higher annual salaries in lower-ranked but not top 15 programs; and (3) for each level of seniority, faculty in top 15 programs are more likely to move at any point in the career than faculty in lower-ranked programs.Citation
Hilmer, Michael J., and Christiana E. Hilmer. 2011. "Negative Returns to Seniority and Job Mobility across the Program Quality Distribution: Are Top Public PhD-Granting Programs Different?" American Economic Review, 101 (3): 466-70. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.3.466JEL Classification
- A11 Role of Economics; Role of Economists
- I23 Higher Education and Research Institutions
- J31 Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
- J44 Professional Labor Markets; Occupational Licensing
- M51 Personnel Economics: Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions