This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. AEA Papers and Proceedings
  4. May 2020
  5. Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication?

AEA Papers and Proceedings

ISSN 2574-0768 (Print) | ISSN 2574-0776 (Online)

Menu

Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication?

  • George K. Ofosu
  • Daniel N. Posner
AEA Papers and Proceedings
vol. 110, May 2020
(pp. 70–74)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

Scholars assert that pre-analysis plans (PAPs) generate boring, lab-report style papers and thus hamper publication. We test this claim by comparing the publication rates of experimental NBER working papers with and without PAPs. We find that articles with PAPs are slightly less likely to be published. However, conditional on being published, PAP-generated papers are significantly more likely to land in top-five journals. Also, PAP-based journal articles generate more citations. Our findings suggest that the alleged trade-off between career concerns and the scientific credibility that comes from registering and adhering to a PAP is less stark than is sometimes alleged.

Citation

Ofosu, George K., and Daniel N. Posner. 2020. "Do Pre-analysis Plans Hamper Publication?" AEA Papers and Proceedings 110: 70–74. DOI: 10.1257/pandp.20201079

Additional Materials

JEL Classification

  • A14 Sociology of Economics
  • I23 Higher Education; Research Institutions