« Back to Results

Econometrics

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 8, 2023 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (CST)

Hilton Riverside, Grand Salon A Sec 3
Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: Augustine Denteh, Tulane University

Inference in Direct Multi-Step and Long Horizon Forecasting Regressions

Asad Dossani
,
Colorado State University

Abstract

This paper proposes and evaluates a new method for inference in direct multi-step and long horizon forecasting regressions. A direct-multi step forecast is a regression of a vector of variables observed at a future horizon on variables observed in the current time period. A long horizon regression is a regression of the cumulative sum of a vector of variables observed through a future horizon on variables observed in the current period. Direct multi-step forecasts and long horizon regressions have a variety of applications in empirical macroeconomics and finance. Examples include local projections and tests of return predictability.

The residuals from both direct multi-step and long horizon forecasting regressions are serially correlated, and can be expressed as a vector moving average (VMA) process of the one step ahead forecast residuals. The proposed estimator imposes the VMA structure on the serially correlated residuals to estimate the covariance matrix of the OLS estimates of direct multi-step and long horizon forecasting regressions. The parameters governing the VMA process are estimated using OLS regressions. In modeling the covariance matrix, I present a unified framework for inference in both direct multi-step and long horizon forecasts, by taking advantage of the fact that error terms in a long horizon forecast are equal to the sum of the error terms from direct multi-step forecasts.

This results in substantially more accurate and efficient estimates of the covariance matrix, relative to existing methods that do not impose any structure on the autocorrelation process of the residuals. A simulation study comparing the proposed estimator with the most commonly used alternative illustrates the benefits of the approach. The proposed estimator has a lower root mean squared error and size tests closer to its nominal values.

Double-Robust Two-Way-Fixed-Effects Regression For Panel Data

Dmitry Arkhangelsky
,
Center for Monetary and Financial Studies
Guido Imbens
,
Stanford University
Lihua Lei
,
Stanford University
Xiaoman Luo
,
University of California-Davis

Abstract

We propose a new estimator for the average causal effects of a binary treatment with panel data in settings with general treatment patterns. Our approach augments the two-way-fixed-effects specification with the unit-specific weights that arise from a model for the assignment mechanism. We show how to construct these weights in various settings, including situations where units opt into the treatment sequentially. The resulting estimator converges to an average (over units and time) treatment effect under the correct specification of the assignment model. We show that our estimator is more robust than the conventional two-way estimator: it remains consistent if either the assignment mechanism or the two-way regression model is correctly specified and performs better than the two-way-fixed-effect estimator if both are locally misspecified. This strong double robustness property quantifies the benefits from modeling the assignment process and motivates using our estimator in practice.

Finite Sample Inference in Incomplete Models

Lixiong Li
,
Johns Hopkins University
Marc Henry
,
Pennsylvania State University

Abstract

We propose confidence regions for the parameters of incomplete models with exact coverage of the true parameter in finite samples. Our confidence region inverts a test, which generalizes Monte Carlo tests to incomplete models. The test statistic is a discrete analogue of a new optimal transport characterization of the sharp identified region. Both test statistic and critical values rely on simulation drawn from the distribution of latent variables and are computed using solutions to discrete optimal transport, hence linear programming problems. We also propose a fast preliminary search in the parameter space with an alternative, more conservative yet consistent test, based on a parameter-free critical value.

Macroeconomic Predictions Using Payments Data and Machine Learning

Ajit Desai
,
Bank of Canada
James Chapman
,
Bank of Canada

Abstract

Predicting the economy’s short-term dynamics—a vital input to economic agents’ decision making process—often uses lagged indicators in linear models. This is typically sufficient during normal times but could prove inadequate during crisis periods such as COVID-19. This paper demonstrates: (a) that payments systems data which capture a variety of economic transactions can assist in estimating the state of the economy in real time and (b) that machine learning can provide a set of econometric tools to effectively handle a wide variety in payments data and capture sudden and large effects from a crisis. Further, we mitigate the interpretability and overfitting challenges of machine learning models by using the Shapley value-based approach to quantify the marginal contribution of payments data and by devising a novel cross-validation strategy tailored to macroeconomic prediction models.

Finite-State Markov-Chain Approximations: A Hidden Markov Approach

Eva Janssens
,
University of Amsterdam
Sean McCrary
,
University of Pennsylvania

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel finite-state Markov chain approximation method for Markov processes with continuous support. The method can be used for both uni- and multivariate processes, as well as non-stationary processes such as those with a life-cycle component. The method is based on minimizing the information loss between a misspecified approximating model and the true data-generating process. In contrast to existing methods, we provide both an optimal grid and transition probability matrix. We provide guidance on how to select the optimal number of grid points. The method outperforms existing methods in several dimensions, including parsimoniousness. We compare the performance of our method to existing methods through the lens of an asset-pricing model, and a life-cycle consumption-savings model. We find the choice of the discretization method matters for the accuracy of the model solutions, the welfare costs of risk, and the amount of wealth inequality a life-cycle model can generate.
JEL Classifications
  • C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General