« Back to Results

Safe Asset and Government Debt

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 7, 2023 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (CST)

Sheraton New Orleans, Maurepas
Hosted By: American Finance Association
  • Chair: Valentin Haddad, University of California-Los Angeles

Credit Crunches and the Great Stagflation

Itamar Drechsler
,
University of Pennsylvania
Alexi Savov
,
New York University
Philipp Schnabl
,
New York University

Abstract

We show that severe credit crunches contributed to the four successive stagflationary cycles that characterize the Great Stagflation of 1965–1982. The crunches were the
result of large outflows of deposits from the banking system that intensified whenever
inflation increased. These deposit outflows were due to the Fed’s policy of imposing a
low ceiling on bank deposit rates, which eliminated the passthrough of the Fed funds
rate to deposits and caused real deposit rates to become increasingly negative as inflation rose. Since credit is an input to firms’ production, the high cost of credit during
the crunches forced firms to raise prices and cut output and employment, i.e., they
led to stagflation. Consistent with this theory, we find a tight relationship between
declines in deposits and bank credit, the buildup of unfilled manufacturing orders
and inflation, and declines in GDP growth, employment and inflation. We then test
the theory in the cross section of manufacturing industries sorted by their dependence
on bank financing and find that during the credit crunches, more finance-dependent
firms raised prices and cut output more, held less inventory, and hired fewer employ-
ees. We similarly find these results for firms financed by banks located in areas that
were more exposed to deposit outflows. Our findings imply that the supply shocks
generated by the credit crunches were an important driver of the Great Stagflation.

A p Theory of Government Debt and Taxes

Wei Jiang
,
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Thomas Sargent
,
New York University
Neng Wang
,
Columbia University
Jinqiang Yang
,
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics

Abstract

We construct a streamlined model of optimal tax smoothing via government debt
issuance that blends features of a model of Barro (1979) with specifications of stochastic
discount factor processes of Black and Scholes (1973) and Harrison and Kreps (1979),
sovereign debt limits of Worrall (1990), and the q theories of investment of Hayashi
(1982). The model can be analyzed almost by hand because its dynamics are described
by a system of three ordinary differential equations. The model contains sharp insights
about how putatively risk-free government debt is evaluated when it is backed by a
risky stream of optimally designed prospective government surpluses. These call for
modifications for some formulas often used in recent macro papers about "r - g".

Measuring U.S. Fiscal Capacity using Discounted Cash Flow Analysis

Zhengyang Jiang
,
Northwestern University
Hanno Lustig
,
Stanford University
Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh
,
Columbia University
Mindy Xiaolan
,
University of Texas-Austin

Abstract

We use discounted cash flow analysis to measure a country's fiscal capacity. Crucially, the discount rate includes a GDP risk premium. We apply our valuation method to the CBO's projections for the U.S. federal government's deficit between 2022 and 2051 and for debt in 2051. We compute an upper bound on the U.S. current fiscal capacity equal to 60% of U.S. GDP in 2021, substantially below the observed debt/GDP ratio. Because of the backloading of projected surpluses, the duration of the surplus claim far exceeds the duration of the outstanding Treasury portfolio. This duration mismatch exposes the government to the risk of rising rates, which would trigger the need for higher tax revenue or lower spending. Reducing this risk by front-loading the surpluses also requires major fiscal adjustment.

Risk-Free Rates and Convenience Yields Around the World

William Diamond
,
University of Pennsylvania
Peter Van Tassel
,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Abstract

This paper constructs risk-free interest rates implicit in index option prices for 9 of the major G10 currencies. We compare these rates to the yields of government bonds to provide international estimates of the convenience yield earned by safe assets. Average convenience yields across countries are highly correlated with the average interest rate in each country, ranging from -5 basis points in low-rate Japan to 61 basis points in high-rate Australia, with the moderate-rate US providing a middling 34 basis points. For each country, a covered interest parity (CIP) deviation constructed from its option-implied rates and those of the US is negative, with these negative CIP deviations growing sharply in periods of financial distress, including the 2020 covid crisis when convenience yields themselves remained moderate. We conclude that risk-free discount rates in the US are especially low due to its central position in the global financial system, particularly during financial crises, but that US safe assets do not earn an unusually large convenience yield in addition.

Discussant(s)
Samuel Hanson
,
Harvard University
Yuliy Sannikov
,
Stanford University
Stavros Panageas
,
University of California-Los Angeles
Wenxin Du
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • G1 - Asset Markets and Pricing