« Back to Results

The Automation of Job Search and Matching

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 9, 2022 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM (EST)

Hosted By: Econometric Society
  • Chair: Roland Rathelot, University of Warwick

Hiring as Exploration

Peter Bergman
,
Columbia University
Danielle Li
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Lindsey Raymond
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

This paper views hiring as a contextual bandit problem: to find the best workers over time, firms must balance “exploitation” (selecting from groups with proven track records) with “exploration” (selecting from under-represented groups to learn about quality). Yet modern
hiring algorithms, based on “supervised learning” approaches, are designed solely for exploitation. Instead, we build a resume screening algorithm that values exploration by evaluating candidates according to their statistical upside potential. Using data from professional services recruiting within a Fortune 500 firm, we show that this approach improves the quality (as measured by eventual hiring rates) of candidates selected for an interview, while also increasing demographic diversity, relative to the firm’s existing practices. The same is not true for traditional supervised learning based algorithms, which improve hiring rates but select far fewer Black and Hispanic applicants. In an extension, we show that exploration-based algorithms are also able to learn more effectively about simulated changes in applicant hiring potential over time. Together, our results highlight the importance of incorporating exploration in developing decision-making algorithms that are potentially both more efficient and equitable.

Broaden Your Horizon: Stimulating Occupational Mobility among Unemployed Job Seekers

Michele Belot
,
Cornell University
Bart de Koning
,
Maastricht University
Didier Fouarge
,
Maastricht University
Philipp Kircher
,
Cornell University and Catholic University-Louvain
Paul Muller
,
VU University Amsterdam
Sandra Phlippen
,
Erasmus University

Abstract

We study the impact of an information treatment for unemployed job seekers. The treatment consists of a personalized email providing suggestions about suitable alternative occupations, including details on the labor market prospects of these occupations. An extended version of the treatment also adds a motivational video aiming to reduce psychological hurdles of switching to a different occupation. The email will be sent to jobseekers active in occupations with relatively poor labor market prospects and will be accompanied by a pre- and posttreatment survey on labor market beliefs and expectations. Administrative data on outflow to work will be used for an evaluation of long-term impacts.

Do Algorithmic Job Recommendations Improve Search and Matching? Evidence from a Large-Scale Randomised Field Experiment in Sweden

Lena Hensvik
,
Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy
Thomas Le Barbanchon
,
Bocconi University
Roland Rathelot
,
University of Warwick

Abstract

We design a job recommender system that recommends job ads to Swedish job seekers. The job recommender system is hosted on the largest online job board in Sweden, and it is based on a collaborative filtering machine-learning algorithm. Within a two-sided randomized experiment, we evaluate how job seekers respond to job recommendations (clicks, applications, job finding, earnings), and whether employers fill their vacant jobs at a faster rate. This paper presents preliminary results for year 2020. We find that job seekers increase by 10-16\% the number of daily clicks/applications on recommended vacancies. We do not find average effects on total job search intensity, job finding rates, or labor earnings. Current developments (e.g. increased saliency of the recommendations) lead to higher treatment effects for 2021 and this will be added to this draft over the next semester.

Digital Tools To Facilitate Job Search

Anita Glenny
,
Aarhus University
Steffen Altmann
,
University of Copenhagen
Robert Mahlstedt
,
University of Copenhagen
Alexander Sebald
,
Copenhagen Business School

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate how online job search assistance affects labor mar- ket performance of unemployed job seekers. We report results from a randomized controlled trial among the universe of Danish unemployment insurance benefit re- cipients. The structure of the experiment allows us to study the effects of (i) rec- ommendations for potentially promising occupations to consider, (ii) the number of available vacancies in occupations that the job seeker already considers, and (iii) the joint effect of the two types of information relative to a control group.
Linking information on treatment status with register data on labor market out- comes, we find that vacancy information as well as occupational recommendations increase working hours and labor earnings for treated individuals relative to the control group. The effects on improved labor market outcomes of the information treatments are of same order of magnitude. Notably, our results suggest that the positive effects of vacancy information and occupational recommendations do not seem to “add up” when being combined. With additional information on job seekers’ registered applications we show how the similar employment effects of occupational recommendations and vacancy information seem to be provoked by different adjust- ments of job search behavior. While occupational recommendations tend to widen job seekers’ focus towards other occupations, the vacancy information seems to lead job seekers to “zoom in” and consider a narrower set of occupations.

Directing Job Search: A Large Scale Experiment

Luc Behaghel
,
Paris School of Economics
Sofia Dromundo
,
Paris School of Economics
Marc Gurgand
,
Paris School of Economics
Yagan Hazard
,
Paris School of Economics
Thomas Zuber
,
Paris School of Economics

Abstract

We analyze the employment effects of directing job seekers’ applications towards es- tablishments likely to recruit, building upon an existing Internet platform developed by the French public employment service. Our two-sided randomization design, with about 1.2 million job seekers and 100,000 establishments, allows to precisely estimate supply- and demand-side effects. We find a 2% increase in job finding rates among women, while establishments advertised on the website increase their hirings on indefinite duration con- tracts by 3%.
JEL Classifications
  • J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers
  • J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor