« Back to Results

Causes and Consequences of Performance Pay

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 5, 2020 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (PDT)

Manchester Grand Hyatt, Harbor F
Hosted By: Labor and Employment Relations Association
  • Chair: Susan R. Helper, Case Western Reserve University

Working Hours, Health and Absenteeism, and Performance Pay

Jed DeVaro
,
California State University-East Bay
John Pencavel
,
Stanford University

Abstract

Two distinct workplace phenomena have been documented concerning workers’ productivity, working hours, health and absenteeism, and pay. First, beyond a certain threshold, long working hours are associated with diminished productivity. Second, at the establishment level, performance pay relates positively to absenteeism and to various workplace health problems that dampen its productivity-enhancing effects.

The two phenomena are potentially related. The mechanism underlying the deleterious productivity effects of long hours might be absenteeism and more of the workplace health problems that (via the second phenomenon) are associated with diminished productivity. If performance pay encourages workers to toil to the point of illness or absenteeism, long hours might be the mechanism for the dampened productivity-enhancing effects of performance pay. Thus, performance pay might encourage long working hours, eroding productivity via an increased incidence of workplace health problems and absenteeism.

This paper investigates empirically the potential connection between the two phenomena at the establishment level, using the British Workplace Employment Relations Study, a broad, worker-firm matched panel data set from 2004 to 2011. The topic has important implications for social welfare; in the U.S., fatigue-related, health-related, lost productive work time to employers was estimated at $136.4 billion annually (Ricci et al. 2007).

No empirical connection is detectable between long hours and numerous workplace health ailments. A positive relationship between long hours and absenteeism is suggested. These results suggest that long hours induce exhaustion, causing workers to skip work to recuperate. An increased establishment-level incidence of performance pay is associated with a shift towards longer working hours, but only up to 40 weekly hours. The results reveal a shift from the left tail of the hours distribution to the middle region (i.e., towards full-time work) when performance pay is increasingly used. Earlier work that neglects performance pay finds that the establishment-level hours-productivity profile peaks at a level of weekly hours beyond 40 (with the peak occurring even higher for labor productivity than for financial performance). An interpretation is that workers who are paid for performance increase their work intensity (i.e., effort per hour), implying that the point of exhaustion arrives earlier in the week.

Analyzing Compensation Methods in Modern Manufacturing: Moving from Piece Rates to Time Rates or Gain-Sharing

Susan R. Helper
,
Case Western Reserve University
Morris M. Kleiner
,
University of Minnesota
Yingchun Wang
,
University of Minnesota

Abstract

TBD

Does Performance Pay Increase Alcohol and Drug Use?

Benjamin Artz
,
University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh
Colin P. Green
,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
John S. Heywood
,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Abstract

An increasingly long literature explores variations on Adam Smith's conjecture that "Workmen.. . when they are liberally paid by the piece, are very apt to overwork themselves, and to ruin their health and constitution in a few years (Smith 1776, p. 83)." Explorations in this literature include the role that performance pay (including piece rates) plays in determining workplace accidents and illness, the role of performance pay in generating stress and burnout and the role of performance pay in leading to the use of mental health services. In this paper, we examine the potential role of performance pay in explaining the pattern of alcohol and drug use.

Using a panel of young workers (NLSY 1997), we show evidence of greater alcohol and illicit drug use among those paid performance pay. Recognizing that this likely reflects worker sorting, we first control for risk and ability proxies. We further mitigate sorting concerns by introducing worker fixed effects, worker-employer match fixed effects and, finally, worker-employer-occupation match fixed effects. These estimates continue to indicate that the risk of substance use increases when performance pay is introduced. While robustness tests examine heterogeneous responses, our evidence fits conjectures that stress and effort increase with performance pay as does the spillover coping mechanism of alcohol and drug use.
Discussant(s)
Michael Gibbs
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs