« Back to Results

Mispricing

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 6, 2019 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM

Hilton Atlanta, Grand Ballroom D
Hosted By: American Finance Association
  • Chair: Justin Birru, Ohio State University

Time-Varying Demand for Lottery: Speculation Ahead of Earnings Announcements

Bibo Liu
,
Tsinghua University
Huijun Wang
,
University of Delaware
Jianfeng Yu
,
Tsinghua University
Shen Zhao
,
Chinese University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen

Abstract

Existing studies find that compared to non-lottery stocks, lottery-like stocks tend to be overpriced and earn lower subsequent returns, probably due to investor preferences for lottery-like assets. We argue that investor preferences for holding speculative assets are more pronounced ahead of firms' earnings announcements, probably due to lower inventory costs and immediate payoffs or due to enhanced attention. We show that there is indeed stronger demand for lottery-like stocks ahead of earnings announcements, leading to a price run-up for these stocks. In sharp contrast to the standard underperformance of lottery-like stocks, we find that lottery-like stocks outperform non-lottery stocks by about 52 basis points in the 5-day window ahead of earnings announcements. However, this return spread is reversed by 80 basis points in the 5-day window after the announcements. Moreover, this inverted-V shaped pattern on cumulative return spreads is more pronounced among firms with more retail order imbalance, with low institutional ownership, and in regions with stronger gambling propensity.

Be Fearful When Households Are Greedy: The Household Equity Share and Expected Market Returns

David Yang
,
University of California-Irvine

Abstract

I define the “Household Equity Share” (HEShare), the share of the household sector’s equity and fixed income assets allocated to equities. HEShare negatively forecasts excess returns on the aggregate US stock market, both univariately and controlling for past changes in equity prices and common market return forecasters. The non-household sector’s equity share does not forecast returns, ruling out economy-wide explanations for HEShare’s return predictability. At times, HEShare predicts negative mean excess market returns, suggesting that behavioral factors explain the findings. Under the behavioral interpretation, the household sector’s “mistiming” of the equity market imposes meaningful portfolio costs.

Climate Risks of Sales Forecasts: Evidence from Satellite Readings of Soil Moisture

Christopher Hansman
,
Imperial College London
Harrison Hong
,
Columbia University
Frank Weikai Li
,
Singapore Management University
Jiangmin Xu
,
Peking University

Abstract

We show that recently-available satellite readings of soil moisture---developed to study the impact of climate change on hydrological cycles---predict the output of the water-intensive food industry. Using sales and forecasts data from thirty-one countries with publicly-traded food companies from 1994-2014, we obtain causal estimates by instrumenting for soil moisture with climatic measures of droughts based on temperature and precipitation. Soil moisture is particularly important for food industry sales in the last decade, a period of historically high temperatures. Consensus sales forecasts by security analysts, widely used to guide corporate investments and adaptations, have not recognized this structural change.

Extrapolative Beliefs in the Cross-section: What Can We Learn from the Crowds?

Zhi Da
,
University of Notre Dame
Xing Huang
,
Washington University-St. Louis
Lawrence Jin
,
California Institute of Technology

Abstract

Using novel data from a crowdsourcing platform for ranking stocks, we investigate how individuals form expectations about future stock returns in the cross-section. In each contest on this platform, participants rank 10 stocks based on their perceived future performance of these stocks over the course of the contest (usually one week). We find that, when forming expectations, investors extrapolate from past returns, with more weight on more recent returns, especially when recent returns are negative. The extrapolation bias is stronger among Forcerank users who are not financial professionals. Moreover, consensus rankings negatively predict future stock returns in the cross-section, more so among stocks with low institutional ownership and a high degree of extrapolative bias, consistent with the asset pricing implications of extrapolative beliefs. This return predictability extends to large stocks that are not covered on the platform and is not driven by liquidity-shock-induced price reversals. Finally, the residual component of the consensus rankings orthogonal to past stock returns also negatively predicts future returns, suggesting that investor sentiment is above and beyond return extrapolation.
Discussant(s)
Peter Kelly
,
University of Notre Dame
Dong Lou
,
London School of Economics
David Solomon
,
Boston College
Abhiroop Mukherjee
,
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
JEL Classifications
  • G1 - General Financial Markets