Inequality in Mortgage, Capital, and Credit Markets
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025 2:30 PM - 4:30 PM (PST)
- Chair: Prakash Loungani, Johns Hopkins University
Price Discrimination and Adverse Selection in the U.S. Mortgage Market
Abstract
This paper documents substantial price dispersion in the U.S. mortgage market, where each given lender charges observably similar borrowers different interest rates for similar loans. To explain the conditional price dispersion, we estimate a structural model that features borrowers’ demand for mortgages and lenders’ individualized optimal pricing decisions. The evidence is consistent with adverse selection in the form of a positive correlation between the unobserved determinants of borrowers’ demand and lenders’ costs. Moreover, lenders’ ability to learn borrowers’ private information from signals and tailor interest rates alleviates the severity of adverse selection. Signals convey more information about lenders’ costs rather than borrowers’ demand, implying that the conditional price dispersion is explained more by lenders’ optimal risk adjustments rather than demand-based price discrimination. In a counterfactual scenario where lenders must set the same interest rates for the observably same borrowers, interest rates increase, and consumer surplus decreases. The effect is heterogeneous across income groups with higher-income borrowers’ interest rates increasing more.Racial Disparities in Credit and Debt and the Effectiveness of State Initiatives to Protect Young Adults Living in Communities of Color During Volatile Economic Times
Abstract
Young adults who experience a recession may experience long-term declines in their employment and earnings potential that undermine their ability to establish financial stability. Such challenges may especially be relevant for young adults living in communities of color, as macroeconomic downturns may worsen structural disparities in financial outcomes along racial lines. During the pandemic recession, many states implemented emergency measures that may have both protected young adults from experiencing long-term declines in credit health and prevented widening racial inequities. Using 18 waves of credit data on 850,000 young adults ages 20-29 from February 2020 to August 2023, I examine how community-level racial disparities in young adults’ credit health changed post-pandemic, community-level explanatory factors of racial disparities in credit, and the impact of extended unemployment insurance programs and utility shutoff moratoria on young adults’ delinquencies and credit scores. I use OLS, Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions, exact matching, and TWFE difference-in-difference models to answer these questions. I test the robustness of TWFE estimates on subsamples of young adults (a) living in communities of color, (b) without student loans at baseline, and (c) living in contiguous border counties; as well as estimating impacts using policy discontinuities at state borders similar to work by Dube, Lester, and Reich (2010) and Schmidt, Shore-Sheppard and Watson (2020). I find that despite elevated levels of economic volatility between 2020 and 2023, young adults living in communities of color experienced relative improvements in their credit health that narrowed racial inequities early in the pandemic. However, these gains showed signs of reversing by August 2023—ultimately worsening racial inequities in credit relative to pre-pandemic levels. These community-level racial disparities in credit were likely driven by differences in wealth-building opportunities across communities in addition to differences in education, incomes, employment, and homeownership.Capital Flows, Income Inequality, and Housing Prices
Abstract
This paper addresses how housing prices respond to global financing conditions, fiscal policy, and productivity shocks using a stylized model that accounts for interactions between international capital movements, relative prices, and income inequality. The analysis highlights that international capital flows affect real housing prices both by changing the equilibrium real exchange rate (and hence the price of non-tradable real estate) and by altering income distribution (and hence the relative income of the marginal home buyer). Fiscal policies aimed at reducing income inequality have different impacts on housing prices depending on their targeting, coverage, and on the share of homeowners in the population. Exogenous productivity shocks have a different impact depending on which sector is hit, and external financing can mitigate these effects in real terms but in some cases amplify the change in nominal prices.Discussant(s)
Richard Koss
,
Columbia University and Recursion Co.
Karan Bhasin
,
SUNY-Albany
Deniz Igan
,
Bank for International Settlements
Enrique Martinez-Garcia
,
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas
JEL Classifications
- G0 - General
- J1 - Demographic Economics