« Back to Results

Household Finance

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 5, 2025 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (PST)

San Francisco Marriott Marquis, Yerba Buena Salon 5 & 6
Hosted By: American Finance Association
  • James Choi, Yale University

The Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers on Consumption and Household Balance Sheets: Experimental Evidence from Two U.S. States

Alexander Bartik
,
University of Illinois-Urbana-Champaign
Elizabeth Rhodes
,
OpenResearch
David Broockman
,
University of California-Berkeley
Patrick Krause
,
OpenResearch
Sarah Miller
,
University of Michigan
Eva Vivalt
,
University of Toronto

Abstract

We provide new evidence on the causal effect of unearned income on consumption, balance
sheets, and financial outcomes by exploiting an experiment that randomly assigned 1000 individ-
uals to receive $1000 per month and 2000 individuals to receive $50 per month for three years. The
transfer increased measured household expenditures by at least $300 per month. The spending im-
pact is positive in most categories, and is largest for housing, food, and car expenses. The treatment
increases housing unit and neighborhood mobility. We find noisily estimated modest positive ef-
fects on asset values, driven by financial assets, but these gains are offset by higher debt, resulting
in a near-zero effect on net worth. The transfer increased self-reported financial health and credit
scores but did not affect credit limits, delinquencies, utilization, bankruptcies, or foreclosures. Ad-
justing for underreporting, we estimate marginal propensities to consume non-durables between
0.44 and 0.55, durables and semi-durables between 0.21 and 0.26, and marginal propensities to
de-lever of near zero. These results suggest that large temporary transfers increase short-term con-
sumption and improve financial health but may not cause persistent improvements in the financial
position of young, low-income households.

Business Education and Portfolio Returns

Adam Altmejd
,
Stockholm University
Thomas Jansson
,
Sveriges Riksbank
Yigitcan Karabulut
,
Frankfurt School of Finance and Management gGmbH

Abstract

Using university admission cutoffs that generate exogenous variation in college-major choices, we provide causal evidence that enrollment in a business or economics program leads individuals to invest significantly more in the stock market, earn higher portfolio returns, and ultimately accumulate higher levels of wealth. Underlying these effects, beyond differences in risk taking, innate ability, labor market outcomes, or scale effects, is the improved ability of business-educated individuals to acquire and process economic information and make informed investment decisions. Early investments in financial literacy thus play an important role in generating higher returns that significantly alter individuals' life-cycle wealth profiles.

Long-term Beliefs and Financial Choices

Laura Starks
,
University of Texas-Austin
Richard Sias
,
University of Arizona
Harry Turtle
,
Colorado State University

Abstract

We hypothesize that long-term (10-year) expectations will help explain individuals’ choices even
after accounting for near-term (1-year) expectations due to cognitive uncertainty associated with
near-term signals. Consistent with our hypothesis: (1) variation in long-term expected returns is
more important than variation in near-term expected returns in explaining heterogeneity in both
the fraction of wealth invested in equity and stock market participation, (2) long-term beliefs
help explain trading decisions, (3) long-term beliefs exhibit (proportionally) less heterogeneity
than near-term beliefs, and (4) respondent characteristics better explain variation in long-term
than near-term beliefs.

Discussant(s)
David Cesarini
,
New York University
Philippe D'astous
,
HEC - Montréal
Michael Weber
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • G1 - General Financial Markets