Contract Theory
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025 2:30 PM - 4:30 PM (PST)
- Chair: Franz Ostrizek, Sciences Po
Tournaments with a Standard
Abstract
We study tournaments where winning a rank-dependent prize requires passing a minimum performance standard. We show that, for any prize allocation, the optimal standard is always at a mode of performance that is weakly higher than the global mode and identify a necessary and sufficient condition for it to be at the global mode. When the prize scheme can be designed as well, the winner-take-all prize scheme is optimal for noise distributions with an increasing failure rate; and awarding equal prizes to all qualifying agents is optimal for noise distributions with a decreasing failure rate. For distributions with monotone likelihood ratios---log-concave and log-convex, respectively---these pay schemes are also optimal in a larger class of anonymous, monotone contracts that may depend on cardinal performance.Bilateral Trade with Costly Information Acquisition
Abstract
We study a bilateral trade problem with flexible but costly information acquisition. There is a buyer and a seller who can trade a single unit of a good through an intermediary who designs a mechanism to facilitate their trade. In the beginning, the buyer, the seller and the intermediary share a common prior over a finite set of states of the world. The intermediary proposes a mechanism to the players, who can then acquire information about the true state by privately designing a signal device. Assuming that the information acquisition cost is proportional to the expected reduction in entropy, we characterize the set of implementable allocations. Using the implementability conditions, given by a finite-dimensional system of equations and inequalities, we maximize the intermediary’s revenue over all implementable allocationally efficient mechanisms. Under certain symmetry conditions, our revenue maximization problem can be solved in closed form.Vague by Design: Performance Evaluation and Learning from Wages
Abstract
We study a dynamic principal-agent setting in which both sides learn about the importance of effort. The quality of the agent’s output is not observed directly. Instead, the principal jointly designs an evaluation and wage schedule. More precise performance evaluation reduces current agency costs but promotes learning, which can increase future agency costs. The optimal evaluation technology is noisy. Information that is purely informative about effort is revealed, while the principal optimally shrouds information about the agent's ability. Under strong complementarities, the optimal evaluation features lower-censorship. In the binary case, it is imprecise and tough: a bad performance is always sanctioned, but a good one not always recognized.JEL Classifications
- D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty