Nature and Biodiversity Finance
Paper Session
Monday, Jan. 5, 2026 1:00 PM - 3:00 PM (EST)
- Caroline Flammer, Columbia University
Nature-Related Risks in Syndicated Lending
Abstract
This study examines how nature-related risks are considered in syndicated lending, showing that firms highly dependent on ecosystem services (nature--dependent firms) incur higher financing costs. Using U.S. syndicated loan data and a novel nature dependency measure, we find a 1% rise in nature dependency results in a 0.32% increase in loan spreads. Leveraging the 2019 Endangered Species Act (ESA) amendment as an exogenous shock, we show regulatory relaxation lowered spreads for nature--dependent firms. Regulating ecosystem services -- vital to environmental stability -- exert the most influence on lending costs, suggesting that natural capital risks are increasingly internalized by financial markets. We also highlight the role of refinancing risk in how banks price nature dependency of borrowers.From Fine to Feathers: Enforcement Stringency, Protectionism, and Biodiversity
Abstract
This study underscores the critical role of policy enforcement stringency in biodiversity conservation. Using birdwatching records to construct sensitive measures of bird species richness, we employ a staggered difference-in-differences approach with China’s Environmental Protection Bureaus (EPBs) reform from 2000 to 2019. Our results reveal significant increases of 23.7% in bird species and 61.9% in bird abundance following the reform. By reducing local protectionism, the reform led to stricter environmental enforcement of local firms, as evidenced by more enforcement cases and higher fines. Firms also strengthened environmental compliance in response to the reform by investing in green patents to mitigate pollution. These results suggest the substantial yet hidden cost to ecosystems of weak policy enforcement, especially because central protectionism limits the reform’s impact, as state-owned enterprises (SOEs) remain less strictly regulated. The study emphasizes the importance of stringent environmental enforcement in achieving biodiversity conservation goals and highlights the need for further reforms to address the privileged status of SOEs. By integrating biodiversity into economic and finance frameworks, the research contributes to understanding the real impact of environmental enforcement on biodiversity and firm behavior, advocating for policies that balance economic growth with environmental sustainability. This research underscores the importance of administrative independence in environmental governance and the need for equitable enforcement across all firm types to achieve long-term conservation goals.Discussant(s)
Parinitha Sastry
,
University of Pennsylvania
Zoey Yiyuan Zhou
,
Columbia University
Eva Steiner
,
Pennsylvania State University
JEL Classifications
- G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance