« Back to Results

Labor Market Barriers

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 4, 2026 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (EST)

Philadelphia Marriott Downtown, Room 406
Hosted By: Labor and Employment Relations Association
  • Chair: Brian W. Sloboda, Department of Labor and University of Maryland Global Campus

Full-Time Work and College Enrollment: The Roles of Scheduling Constraints and Online Education

Dora Gicheva
,
University of North Carolina-Greensboro

Abstract

Enrollment in postsecondary education while employed full-time is a common path to human capital accumulation, but many full-time workers wanting to invest in higher education face time and scheduling constraints. In this paper, I examine the extent to which increasing access to online education relaxes some of these constraints and gives full-time workers more access to educational opportunities. The number of institutions offering a wide array of online learning opportunities has been increasing steadily over time; 11% of undergraduate students were taking exclusively online education courses in Fall 2012, which increased to 17.6% in Fall 2019 and 23.9% in Fall 2022. At the same time, over half of undergraduate students over the age of 25 work full-time and this share has also been increasing in recent years.

Despite the proliferation of online education offerings, there is little empirical research on the impact of this increased supply of online education opportunities on the employment patterns of college students, especially those who are older. This paper examines the extent to which the expansion of online program offerings has lowered the opportunity cost of attending college while working full-time. Given women's generally higher demand for scheduling flexibility, I also document differences by gender.

Use state variations in online education penetration at public four-year institutions, I show that online program availability allows more people to pursue undergraduate degrees while working full-time and in higher-paying jobs. Female workers benefit more from online program availability. These findings underscore the importance for institutions of higher education of providing high-quality online program options.

The Fatal Consequences of Brain Drain

Samuel Dodini
,
Norwegian School of Economics
Alexander Willen
,
Norwegian School of Economics
Katrine Loken
,
Norwegian School of Economics
Petter Lundborg
,
Lund University

Abstract

This paper examines the welfare effects of reallocating high-skilled workers across borders. A domestic labor demand shock in Norway sharply raised wages, drawing Swedish doctors into cross-border commuting. Using linked individual-level data and a dose-response difference-in-differences approach, we show that this outflow of physicians doubled commuting rates, significantly reducing Sweden's domestic doctor supply. The result was a substantial rise in mortality in Sweden, with no corresponding health gains in Norway. These effects were unevenly distributed, disproportionately harming certain places and people. The underlying mechanism was a severe strain on Sweden's healthcare system: physician shortages - particularly young, high-skilled generalists - increased hospitalizations, led to premature discharges, raised readmission rates, and worsened health outcomes. Rising operational costs further delayed critical care. Mortality effects were concentrated in circulatory, respiratory, and infectious diseases conditions requiring urgent intervention, suggesting that physician shortages directly undermined life-saving treatment. Our findings highlight that reallocating skilled labor can generate significant welfare losses, particularly when sending countries face constrained public services.

The Ties that Bind: Occupational Licensing and Family Migration

Kihwan Bae
,
West Virginia University
Edward Timmons
,
Archbridge Institute

Abstract

We examine how the limited portability of occupational licenses across states affects interstate migrants' labor market outcomes. To address selection into migration, we focus on female workers with family ties. First, we show that interstate migration is uncorrelated with their licensing status. Next, we show that the limited portability of occupational licenses has a negative employment effect on female interstate migrants with family ties and reduces the likelihood that they continue the same occupation relative to their peers moving within a state. Our findings suggest occupational licensing barriers have negative implications for interstate migrants' labor market activity and career development.

The Effect of Mobility Restrictions on Refugees

Sam Gyetvay
,
UQÀM
Philipp Jaschke
,
IAB
Kamal Kassam
,
IAB
Sekou Keita
,
IAB

Abstract

We study the effects of a policy that restricted refugees in Germany from moving across federal states for 3 years after receiving asylum. We use a difference-in-difference research design that combines variation in refugees' initially assigned locations with the timing of asylum decisions to estimate causal effects of mobility restrictions on labor market outcomes and location sorting. We also estimate a model of refugees' location choices and use it to infer the counterfactual spatial distribution of refugees in the absence of mobility restrictions.
JEL Classifications
  • J0 - General