This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. ASSA Annual Meeting
  3. 2025
  4. Program
  5. Corporate Investment at Public and Private Firms
« Back to Results

Corporate Investment at Public and Private Firms

Paper Session

Friday, Jan. 3, 2025 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PST)

San Francisco Marriott Marquis, Yerba Buena Salon 5 & 6
Hosted By: American Finance Association
  • Denis Sosyura, Arizona State University

Asymmetric Investment Rates

Hang Bai
,
University of Connecticut
Erica X. N. Li
,
Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business
Chen Xue
,
University of Cincinnati
Lu Zhang
,
Ohio State University

Abstract

Integrating national accounting with financial accounting, we construct firm-specific current-cost capital stocks for the entire Compustat universe. The firm-level current cost investment rate distribution is heavily right-skewed, with a small fraction of negative investment rates, 5.51%, but a huge fraction of positive investment rates, 91.64%. Firm-level investment is also lumpy, featuring a fraction of 32.66% for positive spikes (investment rates higher than 20%). For a typical firm, 39% of total investment is completed within 20% of the sample years. Our data infrastructure also contains firm-specific economic depreciation rates and capital and investment price deflators.

How Do Firms Withstand A Global Economic Shock: Evidence From Within-Firm Responses

Xiao Cen
,
Texas A&M University
Vyacheslav Fos
,
Boston College
Wei Jiang
,
Emory University

Abstract

China's Five-Year Plans (industrial policies targeting specific industries) displace US production/employment and heighten plant closures in the same industries. The shocks were not anticipated by the US stock market, but firms in the treated industries suffer valuation loss afterwards. Firms adjust by shifting production to upstream or downstream industries benefiting from the boost, or offshoring to government-endorsed industries in China. Such within-firm adjustments offset negative shocks among firms with preexisting toeholds in the "beneficiary"" industries or production overseas

Precautionary Debt Capacity

Olivia Kim
,
Harvard University
Deniz Aydin
,
Washington University in St. Louis

Abstract

Firms with ample financial slack are unconstrained... or are they? In a field experiment that randomly expands debt capacity on business credit lines, treated small-and-medium enterprises (SMEs) draw down 35 cents on the dollar of expanded debt capacity in the short-run and 55 cents in the long-run despite having debt levels far below their borrowing limit before the intervention. SMEs direct new borrowing to financing investment gradually over time and do not exhibit a measurable impact on delinquencies. Heterogeneity analysis by the risk of being at the credit line limit supports the SME motive to preserve financial flexibility.

Discussant(s)
Brandon Julio
,
University of Oregon
Gordon M. Phillips
,
Dartmouth College
David Robinson
,
Duke University
JEL Classifications
  • G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance