« Back to Results

Technological Disruptions and Growth

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PST)

Parc 55, Cyril Magnin 3
Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: Josh Lerner, Harvard Business School

The Diffusion of New Technologies

Aakash Kalyani
,
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Nicholas Bloom
,
Stanford University
Marcela Carvalho
,
Harvard University
Tarek Hassan
,
Boston University
Josh Lerner
,
Harvard Business School
Ahmed Tahoun
,
London Business School

Abstract

Substantial concerns remain, about the implications of new technologies, including whether they contribute to income inequality (e.g., do technology-enabled jobs spread beyond college graduates?) and
regional inequality (do technology jobs spread outside Silicon Valley?), due to limited data on the development and spread of multiple technological advances in a single framework. We identify phrases associated with novel technologies using textual analysis of patents, job postings, and earnings calls, enabling us to identify four stylized facts on the diffusion of jobs relating to new technologies. First, the development of new technologies is geographically highly concentrated, more so even than overall patenting: 56% of the economically most impactful technologies come from just two U.S. locations, Silicon Valley and the Northeast Corridor. Second, as the technologies mature and the number of related jobs grows, hiring spreads geographically. But this process is very slow, taking around 50 years to disperse fully. Third, while initial hiring in new technologies is highly skill biased, over time the mean skill level in new positions declines, drawing in an increasing number of lower-skilled workers. Finally, the geographic spread of hiring is slowest for higher-skilled positions, with the locations where new technologies were pioneered remaining the focus for the technology’s high-skill jobs for decades.

New Technology Sectoral Disruptions

Tolga Caskurlu
,
University of Amsterdam
Gerard Hoberg
,
University of Southern California
Gordon M. Phillips
,
Dartmouth College

Abstract

We construct a novel measure of technology sectoral disruptions (TSDs) using a
dynamic text-based spatial model of patents based on the extent to which innovation
is suddenly highly correlated across multiple industries. We identify multiple TSDs
occurring over a 70-year period of time. Abnormal stock returns and insider trading
indicate that TSDs are largely unexpected and generate positive and long-lasting value
gains. Impacted small firms initially increase equity issuance, reduce equity payouts,
and increase both R&D and asset growth and experience increased valuations consistent
with Schumpeter’s 1912 theory of creative destruction. Large firms, on average, reduce
R&D and capital expenditures and experience declining valuations and decreased sales
growth.

Foundational Processes and Growth

Salomé Baslandze
,
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
Leo Liu
,
University of Technology Sydney
Elvira Sojli
,
University of New South Wales
Wing Wah Tham
,
University of New South Wales

Abstract

This paper studies the interaction between process and product innovations and their distinct role in firm growth dynamics. We highlight empirically and theoretically two types of process innovations: foundational processes that advance production technology and cost-reducing processes that enhance existing production efficiency. We develop a model of horizontal differentiation with vertical product heterogeneity to illustrate how these innovations impact firm growth differently and highlight how process innovation induces product innovation. By analyzing millions of patent texts from 1900 to 2020, we classify innovations into product, cost-reducing process, and foundational process innovations. We find that cost-reducing processes are linked to higher short-term firm growth, while foundational processes lead to more sustained firm growth, especially through their effect on subsequent product creation. Using patents linked to FDA-approved drugs, we show that firms with a comparative advantage in creating foundational processes, due to greater knowledge and technological stock, tend to produce higher-value products. Additionally, we find that R\&D-intensive firms focused on "deep-tech" innovations have a significant advantage in creating foundational processes, resulting in superior product quality.

Discussant(s)
Huiyu Li
,
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Jan Bena
,
University of British Columbia
Laurent Cavenaile
,
University of Toronto
JEL Classifications
  • O3 - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights