Biases in Expectation Formation: Evidence and Mechanisms
Paper Session
Friday, Jan. 3, 2025 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM (PST)
- Chair: Dmitry Taubinsky, University of California-Berkeley
What Explains the Gap Between Consumption and Financial Plans and Actions? The Role of Inflation Literacy, Shocks, and Changes in Expectations and Objectives
Abstract
Abstract: Leveraging a large two-wave survey of Icelandic bank customers linked to detailed and comprehensive administrative bank data, we study households’ knowledge of inflation, their understanding of its mechanisms and effects, and how they plan to adjust their expenditures, borrowing, and financial investments to protect themselves from future expected and unexpected inflation. We administer short explanations on various aspects of how inflation works to random subsets of households and test their understanding thereof. We then compare households’ recollections, plans, and understanding of inflation with their expenditure, borrowing, and investment behavior, both before and after administering the explanations. Next we investigate the discrepancies between households’ plans about future expenditures, borrowing, and financial investments and their real actions. Finally, we survey them about the considerations made when making those decisions as well as what roles economic shocks, changes in expectations or objectives, inertia, and other factors played in explaining the discrepancies between their plans and actions.How Inflation Expectations Dis-Anchor: the Role of Selective Memory Cues
Abstract
This paper highlights the central role of cued recall for understanding the formation of inflationexpectations. We present a memory model of belief formation about inflation, which predicts sharp belief instability due to selective, similarity-based, recall of past inflation experiences. We test the model’s prediction using individual-level inflation expectations from the New York Fed’s Survey of Consumer Expectations and the University of Michigan’s Consumer Survey. The model can explain how expectations quickly became unanchored during the recent post-pandemic rise in inflation, and how expectations of the elderly rose faster and more sharply than those of the young. It also makes novel predictions for how people estimate and allocate weights to future inflation ranges, which also turn out to be consistent with the data.
Beliefs About the Economy are Excessively Sensitive to Household-Level Shocks: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data
Abstract
We study how people's beliefs about the economy covary with household-level events, utilizing a unique link between Danish administrative data and a large-scale survey of consumer expectations. We find that compared to actual inflation, people's inflation forecasts covary much more strongly (and negatively) with both recently realized household income changes and measures of expected future household income changes. We formally establish that these findings are stark deviations from the Bayesian limited-information rational expectations (LIRE) benchmark. Similar results hold for perceptions of past inflation (“backcasts”), suggesting that imperfect recall is a key mechanism for biased forecasts. Building on this, a series of additional tests, some of which utilize data on adverse health events, suggests that the forecast biases are at least partly due to selective recall cued by affective associations. That is, negative (positive) household-level events cue negative (positive) recollections, which lead to pessimistic (optimistic) forecasts.JEL Classifications
- E7 - Macro-Based Behavioral Economics
- D9 - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics