« Back to Results

Recent Advances and Applications in IO

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 4, 2025 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (PST)

Hilton San Francisco Union Square, Union Square 14
Hosted By: Econometric Society
  • Chair: Gautam Gowrisankaran, University of Columbia

Conservation Priorities and Environmental Offsets: Markets for Florida Wetlands

Daniel Aronoff
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Will Rafey
,
University of California-Los Angeles

Abstract

We introduce an empirical framework for valuing markets in environmental offsets. Using newly-collected data on wetland conservation and offsets, we apply this framework to evaluate a set of decentralized markets in Florida, where land developers purchase offsets from long-lived producers who restore wetlands over time. We find that offsets led to substantial private gains from trade, creating $2.2 billion of net surplus from 1995–2018 relative to direct conservation. Offset trading also generated new hydrological externalities. A locally differentiated Pigouvian tax would have prevented $1.3 billion of new flood damage while preserving more than two-thirds of the private gains from trade.

A Field Experiment on Antitrust Compliance

Kei Kawai
,
University of California-Berkeley
Jun Nakabayashi
,
Kyoto University

Abstract

We study the effectiveness of firms' compliance programs by conducting a field experiment in which we disclose to a subset of Japanese firms evidence that the firm is potentially engaging in illegal bid-rigging. We find that the information that we disclose affects the behavior of the treated firms: our test of bid-rigging fails to reject the null of competition for the treated firms after the intervention. We find evidence that this change is not the result of firms ceasing to collude, however. We find evidence that this change is instead the result of active concealment of evidence by cartelizing firms.

Regulating New Product Testing: the FDA vs the Invisible Hand

Allan Collard-Wexler
,
Duke University
Matthew Grennan
,
University of California-Berkeley
Andrew Steck
,
University of Toronto

Abstract

Product testing plays an important role in the functioning of markets for innovative new products, where uncertainty exists regarding the product’s safety, quality, or other attributes. In spite of this, an incomplete understanding of the economic trade-offs and their quantitative welfare implications has contributed to different products facing a wide range of regulatory regimes and private testing incentives (and even similar or identical products facing disparate regulations across geography and time). In this paper, we develop a dynamic model of innovation, testing, and competition between firms to examine the interplay between private incentives to test and regulatory requirements. We calibrate the model using data from the medical device sector and then consider the welfare implications of different regulatory regimes, unpacking the economic forces that drive them. Our results highlight that even in the absence of regulatory requirements, firms have substantial private incentives to conduct their own product tests, and accounting for these is critical to good policy. Optimal regulation weighs the treatment effect of inducing more testing with the selection effect that more testing requirements deter some products from entering the market. Our model also reveals a new and important dynamic “pruning” effect, whereby selection that excludes lower quality products increases market incentives for higher quality products. We also quantify the substantial inefficiency of ex-post quality regulation. By contrast, simple ex-ante minimum testing regulations perform surprisingly well in our calibrated model.

Investment and Usage of the Subsea Internet Cable Network

Jihye Jeon
,
Boston University
Marc Rysman
,
Boston University

Abstract

This paper studies the construction and use of undersea internet cables, a
critical piece of communication infrastructure. We view traffic on these cables
as international trade in data. We propose a model in which country-to-country
trade in data, similar to a gravity equation model, traverses the cable network
leading to interregional flows observed in our data. On the supply side, firms
decide whether to invest in new cables, recognizing the impact of their investment
in any one market on global internet flows. We estimate this model using
new data on cable construction and usage via moment inequalities. We use the
results to decompose growth in global internet usage into growth in demand
and improvements in the cable network. We find that the latter is an important
contributor on par with the former. Our counterfactuals highlight the role of
business stealing and network externalities in generating inefficient allocation
of cables.

Discussant(s)
Stephen P. Ryan
,
Washington University-St. Louis
Matthew Ryan Backus
,
University of California-Berkeley
Gautam Gowrisankaran
,
University of Columbia
Mo Xiao
,
University of Arizona
JEL Classifications
  • L0 - General
  • L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies