« Back to Results

Consequences for Hispanics of Public Policies, Law Enforcement, and Anti-Hispanic Sentiment

Paper Session

Friday, Jan. 5, 2024 2:30 PM - 4:30 PM (CST)

Grand Hyatt, Seguin B
Hosted By: American Society of Hispanic Economists
  • Chairs:
    German Blanco, Illinois State University
  • Alfonso Flores-Lagunes, Syracuse University

Public Responses to Climate and Enforcement: Evidence from Immigrant-Serving Community-Based Organizations during the 2016 Presidential Election

Robert Santillano
,
University of California-Los Angeles
Juan M. Pedroza
,
University of California-Santa Cruz
Stephanie Potochnick
,
University of North Carolina-Charlotte

Abstract

Federal immigration policies and enforcement change across presidential administrations. Intentions for these changes start during presidential campaigns and are reflected in policy changes and enforcement practices once the winning administration takes office. Throughout these changes, community-based organizations (CBOs) are on the front-lines of local efforts to help immigrant and noncitizen families navigate these changes and fill gaps in public services. Specifically, CBOs are often the main providers of economic (e.g., foodbanks), social (e.g., English language classes), legal (e.g., pro-bono legal services), and civic (e.g., naturalization classes) supports for immigrants and their families to integrate into the U.S.

In this paper, we study whether local communities responded to the increased anti-immigrant rhetoric and resulting enforcement practices surrounding the 2016 presidential election. Specifically, we assess whether support for CBOs – as measured by monetary donations – was influenced nationwide leading up to and through the election (climate effects), as well as whether there were differential local effects once the new administration increased interior enforcement through raids (enforcement effects).

Ethnic Profiling Under the Auspices of Community Safety

Joaquin Alfredo-Angel Rubalcaba
,
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Alberto Ortega
,
Indiana University
Prentiss A. Dantzler
,
University of Toronto-St. George

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of 287(g) agreements on ethnic profiling
of Hispanics in traffic stops by local law enforcement agencies in North Carolina. The concern is that
Hispanic Americans may experience a heightened level of policing and scrutiny of citizenship by local
law enforcement officers, given a potential typecasting of Hispanics as the “usual suspects.” Ultimately,
this construction of social illegality (Flores and Schachter, 2018), along with the delegated authority of
ICE, endorses the ethnic profiling of Hispanics. Moreover, we are particularly aware of the historical and
persistent nature of racism and discrimination throughout the South. It is especially concerning given that
the over policing of Hispanic communities may also implicate policing behaviors in neighboring Black
communities, potentially adding an additional strain on intergroup relations.

The New Marriages Composition and the 2016 Presidential Elections

Elisa Taveras Pena
,
University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley
Xin Liang
,
University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley
Leila Salarpour
,
United Nations

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the effect of the 2016 presidential election on the proportion
of new marriages that are intermarriages (between an immigrant and a non-immigrant).
We concentrate on this election because the 45th presidential term put into motion a
series of changes to the immigration system, ranging from the increase in enforcement to
obstacles to legal immigration (Pierce & Selee (2017), Garcia Hernandez (2021)). While
these migration policies might reduce romantic relationships between non-immigrants
(US-born) and immigrants due to fewer new immigrants entering the US, it could lead to
an increase in these types of marriages for two reasons. First, relative to other statuses
(e.g., work visa), a green card through marriage might become an easier legal process, and
second, partners in a non-immigrant/immigrant relationship might decide to get married
to avoid migration issues. To the extent that the positive effect is more important, we
will see an increase in marriages between non-immigrants (US-born) and immigrants
post-2016.

Immigration Policies and School Bullying

Esther Arenas-Arroyo
,
Vienna University of Economics and Business
Catalina Amuedo-Dorantes
,
University of California-Merced

Abstract

This paper studies whether and how immigration policies impact school bullying. We use
administrative data from the Civil Rights Data Collection and individual data from the California
Healthy Kids Survey along with from 2010 to 2018 school years, we examine the impact of
sanctuary policies on bullying. Exploiting the geographic and temporal variation in the enactment
of sanctuary policies for identification, we document how sanctuary policies have raised the
volume of reported bullying incidents based on race/ethnicity against Hispanic male youth. This
impact is unique to Hispanic youth, as opposed to white non-Hispanic, blacks, or Asian students.
It is also unique to bullying incidents based on race/ethnicity, as opposed to bullying based on sex
or disability. Exploring the mechanism behind this effect, we show that the observed rise in
reported bullying against Hispanic youth is due to increased bullying against this demographic.

Discussant(s)
Joaquin Alfredo-Angel Rubalcaba
,
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
Maria Padilla-Romo
,
University of Tennessee-Knoxville
Chunbei Wang
,
Virginia Tech
Christopher Campos
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • J1 - Demographic Economics
  • K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law