Credit and the Family: The Economic Consequences of Closing the Credit Gap of US Couples
Abstract
Closing disparities in credit access between spouses can help reduce consumption inequalityin the household. The 2013 reversal of the Truth-in-Lending Act increased the borrowing
capacity of secondary earners in equitable-distribution states but not in community-property
states, where division-of-property laws superseded the policy change. Using a matched
difference-in-differences design and administrative financial-transaction records measuring
the credit and consumption of each spouse, I show that this reversal increased secondary
earners’ credit card limits by $1,025. In turn, spouses shared consumption more equally,
closing their pre-reversal consumption gap by 10 percent. Household spending shifted toward
goods that benefit both spouses. Delinquency rates were not measurably impacted,
suggesting that household financial standing did not worsen. These results are consistent
with a model of joint decision-making under limited commitment, in which credit causes a
shift in marital bargaining power.