Hot Spots Around the World
Paper Session
Saturday, Jan. 7, 2023 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (CST)
- Chair: Carlos Seiglie, Rutgers University
Red Scare? A Study of Ethnic Prejudice in the Prosecutions under the Economic Espionage Act
Abstract
We empirically test whether the Department of Justice (DOJ) engages in ethnic prejudice against Chinese in its prosecutorial decisions under the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) of 1996. Using data of EEA cases from November 1996 to June 2021, we conduct Becker’s outcome test for evidence of ethnic prejudice. We find that Chinese-named defendants were more likely to be dismissed by trial or acquitted by jury, and were found guilty on fewer counts, and on average received harsher indictments. These results are robust regardless of whether we consider all cases or only arguably “marginal” cases. We also find that, for those publicly listed victim firms whose trade secrets were allegedly stolen by the charged defendants, the stock market reaction was much more muted to the news on the case filing date if the charged defendants are of Chinese descent. Our study provides the first systematic evidence that the DOJ’s prosecutorial decisions in the application of the EEA may have been tainted by ethnic prejudice against Chinese, including American citizens of Chinese descent.Identifying the Effects of Sanctions on the Iranian Economy Using Newspaper Coverage
Abstract
This paper focuses on the identification and quantitative estimation of sanctions on the Iranian economy over the period 1989–2019. It provides a new time series approach and proposes a novel measure of sanctions intensity based on daily newspaper coverage. In absence of sanctions, Iran’s average annual growth could have been around 4-5 per cent, as compared to the 3 per cent realized. Estimates of the proposed sanctions-augmented structural VAR show that sanctions significantly decrease oil export revenues, result in substantial depreciation of Iranian rial, followed by subsequent increases in inflation and falls in output growth. Keeping other shocks fixed, two years of sanctions can explain up to 60 per cent of output growth forecast error variance, although a single quarter sanction shock proves to have quantitatively small effects.Information Operations Increase Civilian Security Cooperation
Abstract
Information operations are considered a central element of modern warfare and counterinsurgency, yet there remains little systematic evidence of their effectiveness. Using a geographic quasi-experiment conducted during Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan, we demonstrate that civilians exposed to the government's information campaign resulted in more civilian security cooperation, which in turn increased bomb neutralizations. These results are robust to a number of alternative model specifications that account for troop presence, patrol-based operations, and local military aid allocation as well as a series of novel placebo tests and latent radio signal propagation approaches. The paper demonstrates that information campaigns can lead to substantive attitudinal and behavioral changes in an adversarial environment and substantially improve battlefield outcomes.Discussant(s)
Solomon W. Polachek
,
SUNY-Binghamton
Jun Xiang
,
Rutgers University
Wei Xiao
,
SUNY-Binghamton
David Slichter
,
SUNY-Binghamton
JEL Classifications
- F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
- H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies