« Back to Results

Topics in Macro and International

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 7, 2023 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (CST)

New Orleans Marriott, Preservation Hall Studio 1
Hosted By: Cliometric Society
  • Chair: Mike Haupert, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse

Muddling through or Tunnelling Through? UK Monetary and Fiscal Exceptionalism during the Great Inflation

Oliver Bush
,
London School of Economics
Michael Bordo
,
Rutgers University
Ryland Thomas
,
Bank of England

Abstract

"The recent resurgence in inflation in the US and UK has resonance with the Great Inflation of the 1960s and 70s. The UK's inflation experience in the 1960s and 1970s was one of the worst of the advanced countries, and unique in both scale and incidence. This paper reconsiders the historical and empirical record of inflation in the UK from 1950s to the early 1990s through the lens of recent advances in economic theory, focusing on the role of monetary and fiscal policy interactions.

Retrospectively, it is not clear that a tighter monetary policy alone would have been sufficient to reduce underlying inflation expectations, without changes in the fiscal regime. In the mid-1970s primary public sector deficits were used to absorb and mitigate the implications of high energy prices with little or no attention paid to stabilising the debt in the longer term. The major shifts down in expectations in the later 1970s and early 1980s only occurred following major changes in the fiscal policy framework, reflecting the introduction of cash limits on government spending, the benefits of North Sea Oil revenues and the abandonment of fiscal policy as a stabilisation tool and its subordination to monetary policy. This appears consistent with Sargent’s (1981) view that moderately large inflations are brought fundamentally to an end as much by changes in the fiscal policy regime as the monetary policy regime, and an acceptance of that regime by all participants in the economy.

Paper: https://www.atlantafed.org/-/media/documents/news/conferences/2022/05/23/monetary-and-financial-history-workshop/bordo-bush-thomas.pdf"

Protectionism and Industrialization in Colonial India

Sharbani Bhattacharjee
,
Oberlin College

Abstract

I study the impact of a key industrial policy in the early 20th century on the long run industrial development of India. British colonial policy of free trade and laissez-faire approach is one of the factors blamed for sluggish industrialization in India. Following the World War I, the changing political and fiscal dynamics catalyzed India’s attainment of fiscal autonomy and implementation of a temporary trade protection policy. I construct a panel of industrial outcomes and use the variation in protection intensity across industries to estimate the causal effect of the protection policy on the long-term performance of the Indian manufacturing industries, after the tariffs were withdrawn. The empirical findings show evidence of dynamic learning effects and increasing returns to scale for the industries that received greater protection. Highly protected industries experienced significant expansion in value of output, capital acquisitions, employment, value added, and number of establishments. These industries also exhibited increase in capital and labor productivity. Together the findings suggest that the British unrestrained trade policy did hinder industrial growth in India which got a boost due to the temporary protectionist drive. The results have important implications for the infant-industry debate and how colonial policies have shaped India’s development. Summary Link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NAct8PcfuKjbZbmyHV4tsMlapDP9ZldT/view?usp=sharing

Does Trade Liberalization Boost Innovation? Evidence from French Industrial Sectors in the 19th Century

Carla Salvo
,
Sapienza University of Rome

Abstract

This study explores the role of trade liberalization on industrial decisions to innovate. To this end, I examine how French industrial producers responded to 19th-century trade liberalization in terms of adopting a key technology at the time: steam power. The identification strategy is based on a diff-in-diff approach, which combines industrial power-use statistics from the earliest French industrial censuses of 1843 and 1863 with industry-specific tariff-changes detailed in the Cobden–Chevalier Treaty of 1860. My preliminary findings show that trade liberalization had a positive and profound effect on technical change, which I argue was a direct response to increased foreign competition.

Discussant(s)
Alain Naef
,
Bank of France
Bishnupriya Gupta
,
University of Warwick
Claudia Steinwender
,
Ludwig Maximilian University-Munich
JEL Classifications
  • N0 - General
  • F0 - General