The Assimilation, Integration and Contributions of Refugees
Paper Session
Sunday, Jan. 8, 2023 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM (CST)
- Chair: William Kerr, Harvard University
Rising from the "Dust": Assimilation of AHA Immigrants from Vietnam into America
Abstract
We study the long-run assimilation to the United States of Amerasians who were born in Vietnam with a U.S. father during the Vietnam War. Following a sequence of unexpected events, the Amerasian Homecoming Act led to more than 20,000 Amerasians and 50,000 accompanying relatives migrating to the United States from 1989 to 1995. We show that small differences in age of arrival, specifically being 14-17 on entry compared to 18-21, resulted in substantial differences in future economic and social outcomes, despite the younger migrants entering under worse conditions. We trace the role of education and the types of firms who employed the migrants over the next three decades using employer-employee data.Language Training and Refugees' Integration
Abstract
We evaluate a Danish reform focused on improving Danish language training for those granted refugee status on or after January 1, 1999. Using a Regression Discontinuity Design we find a significant, permanent, positive effect on earnings. This effect emerged after completion of language classes and was accompanied by additional schooling and higher probability of working in communication-intensive jobs, suggesting that language training, rather than other minor aspects of the reform, produced it. We also find evidence of higher completion rates of lower secondary school and lower probability of crime for male children with both parents exposed to the reform.The Fiscal Effect of Immigration: Reducing Bias in Influential Estimates
Abstract
Immigration policy can have important net fiscal effects that vary by immigrants’ skill level. But mainstream methods to estimate these effects are problematic. Methods based on cash-flow accounting offer precision at the cost of bias; methods based on general equilibrium modeling address bias with limited precision and transparency. A simple adjustment greatly reduces bias in the most influential and precise estimates: conservatively accounting for capital taxes paid by the employers of immigrant labor. The adjustment is required by firms’ profit-maximizing behavior, unconnected to general equilibrium effects. Adjusted estimates of the positive net fiscal impact of average recent U.S. immigrants rise by a factor of 3.2, with a much shallower education gradient. They are positive even for an average recent immigrant with less than high school education, whose presence causes a present-value subsidy of at least $128,000 to all other taxpayers collectively.JEL Classifications
- J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers
- J0 - General