« Back to Results

Economics of Addictive Goods

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 9, 2022 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM (EST)

Hosted By: Chinese Economic Association in North America
  • Chair: Ming-Jen Lin, National Taiwan University

The Impact of Recreational Cannabis Laws on Cannabis Use: How You Measure the Market Matters

Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
,
University of Southern California and NBER
Gregory Tung
,
Colorado School of Public Health
Christine Buttorff
,
RAND Corporation

Abstract

As of January 1, 2021, over half of US states have allowed cannabis for medical use, and 10 states have allowed recreational sales. The value of the legal cannabis market has grown to exceed $38 billion in 2019 and is estimated to nearly triple in value in 5 years. Considerable research attention has been given to the impact of legalization on a variety of public health and criminal justice outcomes. However, criticisms have been raised due to the literature’s lack of distinction between the passage of the law, opening of markets, and the growth of markets. Physical availability is something regulators have been told to consider carefully. Exposure to retailers is expected to increase use of cannabis by increasing environmental cues promoting use, reducing search costs, deterring quit attempts and lowering prices due to competition. Strategically managing availability might allow for growth in the market while helping reduce potential harmful effects of legalization on various public health outcomes such as youth use, motor vehicle crashes and psychoses.
In this paper we investigate how legalization of cannabis for adult-use (i.e. “recreational cannabis”) influences cannabis-related use and harm focusing on alternative ways cannabis policy has been evaluated. We make use of Colorado’s early market experience for both medical and recreational cannabis (2010-2018), and exploit the natural within state variation in access to medical and recreational markets. Merging data from Colorado’s Department of Revenue on licensed outlets and the Colorado Hospital Association data on cannabis-involved ED and inpatient visits at the county level, we demonstrate how and why it is important to appropriately consider the presence and size of medical markets when evaluating the impacts of legalization on cannabis use. Our results suggest that impacts of restrained cannabis markets on cannabis use.

Unscheduled C-sections and Mother's Subsequent ER Visits for Substance Abuse

Adriana Corredor-Waldron
,
Princeton University
Janet Currie
,
Princeton University and NBER
Molly Schnell
,
Northwestern University and NBER

Abstract

Mothers who have C-sections are usually prescribed opioids. We focus on mothers in New Jersey who had unscheduled C-sections, meaning that the time and therefore the surgeon were not directly chosen by the mothers. We show that conditional on the hospital and year, women who were delivered by doctors with high C-section rates were more likely to have C-sections, and that these doctors also have high rates of prescribing opioids. Following these women over time using state hospital and emergency room records, we show that those who had unscheduled C-sections are more likely to visit the ER for substance abuse in the two years after the birth. These findings suggest that opioids prescribed to women with C-sections are an important cause of substance-abuse disorders, and that other approaches to pain relief are urgently
needed.

Getting into the Weeds of Tax Invariance

Benjamin Hansen
,
University of Oregon
Kendall Houghton
,
U.S. Census Bureau
Keaton Miller
,
University of Oregon
Caroline Weber
,
University of Kentucky

Abstract

We provide the first general empirical test of tax invariance (TIV). When a 25 per-cent tax remitted by manufacturers was eliminated in Washington state and the retail cannabis excise tax was simultaneously increased from 25 to 37 percent—a shift in-tended to be revenue-neutral—TIV did not hold. Manufacturers kept two-thirds of their tax savings instead of passing all their savings through to retail firms via lower prices as predicted by TIV. One-third of the retail tax increase was passed on to consumers via higher retail prices – TIV would have predicted constant or even declining tax-inclusive retail prices.

Malleability of Alcohol Consumption: Evidence from Migrants

Marit Hinnosaar
,
University of Nottingham, Carlo Alberto College, and CEPR
Elaine M. Liu
,
University of Houston and NBER

Abstract

How malleable is alcohol consumption? Specifically, how much is alcohol consumption driven by the current environment versus individual characteristics? To answer this question, we analyze changes in alcohol purchases when consumers move from one state to another in the United States. Right after moving, movers’ alcohol purchases converge sharply toward the average level in their destination state, implying that the current environment explains about two-thirds of the differences in alcohol purchases. The adjustment takes place both on the extensive and intensive margin.

Discussant(s)
Yu-Wei Luke Chu
,
Victoria University of Wellington
Kosali Simon
,
Indiana University and NBER
Scott Cunningham
,
Baylor University
Sarah Moshary
,
University of Chicago
JEL Classifications
  • I1 - Health
  • K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior