« Back to Results

International Capital Flows before and during the COVID Crisis

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 8, 2022 3:45 PM - 5:45 PM (EST)

Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: Linda Goldberg, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Changing Patterns of Capital Flows

Gerardo Garcia
,
Bank of Mexico
Livio Stracca
,
European Central Bank

Abstract

This report analyses the changing patterns in the composition and dynamics of capital flows and discusses the macroeconomic and, in particular, the financial stability implications of these changes. It finds that global factors have played a significant role in driving capital inflows to EMEs in particular. There has been an abundance of global liquidity since the GFC, fuelling international investors’ pursuit of yield. Shifts in risk appetite have also had an important effect, especially in response to the Covid shock. That said, with improvements in EMEs’ macroeconomic fundamentals and institutional frameworks, investors are becoming more selective. Due to EMEs’ structural achievements, cyclical factors have become more significant drivers of capital flows and the distinctions between advanced economies and some EMEs are blurring.
The report also assesses the effectiveness of policy tools for managing the risks associated with extreme shifts in capital flows. It concludes that, even for countries with strong structural policies and sound fundamentals, there are circumstances in which additional policy tools, particularly macroprudential measures, occasional foreign exchange intervention and liquidity provision mechanisms, can help mitigate capital flow-related risks. However, these tools are no substitute for reforms aimed at strengthening the resilience of the economy and financial system. In addition, the Covid-19 crisis highlighted the critical role played by the global financial safety net, as well as the importance of developing a better understanding of the joint impact that policy tools have on capital flows.

Capital Flows-at-Risk: Push, Pull and the Role of Policy

Fernando Eguren-Martin
,
Bank of England and University of Oxford
Cian O'Neill
,
Bank of England
Andrej Sokol
,
European Central Bank, Bank of England and CfM
Lukas von dem Berge
,
Bank of England

Abstract

We characterise the probability distributions of various categories of gross capital flows conditional on information contained in financial asset prices in a panel of emerging market economies, with a focus on `tail' events. Our framework, based on the quantile regression methodology, allows for a separate role of push- and pull-type factors, and because it is based on high-frequency data, can quantify the likelihood of different outturns before official capital flows data are released. We find that both push and pull factors have heterogeneous effects across the distributions of gross capital flows, which are most marked in the left tails. We also explore the role of various policies, and find that macroprudential and capital flows management measures are stabilising, leading to lower chances of either large portfolio inflows or outflows. We use our framework to provide a characterisation of capital flows to EMEs after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.

How Capital Inflows Translate into New Bank Lending: Tracing the Mechanism

Carlos Cantu
,
Bank for International Settlements
Catherine Casanova
,
Bank for International Settlements

Abstract

This meta-analysis explores the transmission mechanism that links foreign capital inflows and domestic bank lending based on credit registry data from five Latin American economies. Capital inflows can lower the funding constraints of domestic banks in EMEs, translating into higher domestic credit growth. Also, if productive firms had difficulties in accessing credit or faced prohibitively high borrowing costs, capital inflows might lead to a more efficient allocation of financial resources. The results point to an easing of financing conditions when capital flows into the country, particularly for lower credit quality borrowers and through cross-border interbank flows. Banks that rely the most on volatile funding sources and have the weakest loan portfolios contribute to this easing of financing conditions, although the results are nuanced at the country level. There is also evidence that banks charge higher risk premiums on risky borrowers to raise their capital cushions. Overall these findings suggest that there are substantial benefits from capital inflows for the domestic economy in EMEs although the Covid-19 period challenges can challenge this view.

Discussant(s)
Kristin J. Forbes
,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Livio Stracca
,
European Central Bank
Alessandro Rebucci
,
Johns Hopkins University
Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan
,
University of Maryland and International Monetary Fund
JEL Classifications
  • F3 - International Finance
  • F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance