+1 vote
asked ago in General Economics Questions by (130 points)
Most sessions at the ASSA meetings follow a relatively simple format: talk/discussant x 4.

This has the advantage of allowing people to switch between sessions at the 30/60/90-minute points, but other than that do you feel it is a good format? To me it feels a bit limiting.

Claudia Sahm and I are organising a session on Cognitive Economics (8am, Sunday 6th Jan) and we have decided to vary the standard format a bit: we are still presenting 4 papers but in just 22 minutes each, allowing half an hour for a panel discussion at the end. In the panel, George Loewenstein, Miles Kimball and I will discuss developments in the cognitive economics field and relate this back to the four papers. The discussion will allow some time for audience Q&A too, but we will limit Q&A during the papers themselves to clarification questions.

Would be interested in any other variations on the format that you have seen, and what you think worked well or did not.

Please log in or register to answer this question.