A cool XXI century solution would be along the lines of journalism on the blockchain and the beautiful study in Nature by Camerer et al. (2018) (see also "can gambling save science?" on marginalrevolution.com). Long story short: let people bet money on a piece of research being nonsense and not reproducible, and let people support their claim with arguments, and let other people join or bet against them. Example: you do not believe in the currency momentum, and you go to a special platform where you could bet 100 bucks that the paper is not reproducible on a longer setting; I have long supported your view but never had time to check myself, so I put another 100 bucks in your support, but my colleagues would like to bet against you and me with their money; you then conduct the study, and the outcome is resolved somehow, the winning party taking the pile of cash home.