Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data 12/07/2019 08:10:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 12/07/2019 03:10:AM

Project Citation: 

Blumenstock, Joshua, Callen, Michael, and Ghani, Tarek. Replication data for: Why Do Defaults Affect Behavior? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2018. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-12-07. https://doi.org/10.3886/E116198V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary We report on an experiment examining why default options impact behavior. By randomly assigning employees to different varieties of a salary-linked savings account, we find that default enrollment increases participation by 40 percentage points—an effect equivalent to providing a 50% matching incentive. We then use a series of experimental interventions to differentiate between explanations for the default effect, which we conclude is driven largely by present-biased preferences and the cognitive cost of thinking through different savings scenarios. Default assignment also changes employees' attitudes toward saving, and makes them more likely to actively decide to save after the study concludes.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      C93 Field Experiments
      D14 Household Saving; Personal Finance
      D91 Micro-Based Behavioral Economics: Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
      O12 Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.