« Back to Results

Economic Inequality in Asia

Paper Session

Saturday, Jan. 4, 2020 2:30 PM - 4:30 PM (PST)

Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego, Cove
Hosted By: American Committee on Asian Economic Studies
  • Chair: Calla Wiemer, American Committee on Asian Economic Studies

Inequality in China: Development, Transition, and Policy

Shi Li
Zhejiang University
Terry Sicular
University of Western Ontario
Finn Tarp
University of Copenhagen


The evolution of income inequality in China over the past 40 years is the net result of four interleaved stories. The first story is a standard development story characterized by structural change, growing market integration, and labor absorption, which together are associated with a Kuznets inverted-U path of inequality. The second is the economic transition story, in which the shift from a planned to a market economy generates increased differentiation of incomes. Third is the story of incomplete transition, which generates opportunities for rent seeking, corruption, and hidden income. with obvious implications for inequality. Fourth is the story of government efforts to moderate inequality, which efforts have expanded over time and led to the establishment of a range of new social and welfare programs. We discuss in turn each of these stories and their relationship to the evolution of China’s income inequality.

International Trade and Income Distribution: Evidence from China

Oliver Holtemöller
Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH)
Yanqun Zhang
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences


We explore the development of labor’s share in income and wage inequality in China since
2000 and estimate the effect of international trade on regional income distributions. Two major
shocks have driven Chinese exports after 2000. The first event is China’s WTO entry and
the second one is the collapse of world trade during the worldwide financial crises. We use
regional data for provinces and for prefecture-level cities and consider both events to be exogenous
with respect to wage development in the individual regions. We control for individual
worker characteristics using several waves of Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) data. We find
that more international trade is associated with lower labor shares and higher wage inequality,

Trade Liberalization and Income Inequality: The Case of Pakistan

Muhammad Aamir Khan
COMSATS University
Terrie Walmsley
Kakali Mukhopadhyay
McGill University


Trade liberalization policies have been adopted by many developing countries to increase economic growth and reduce poverty. While the positive relationship between trade liberalization and economic growth is generally well accepted, the impact of trade liberalization on poverty and income inequality is still unclear. The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of trade liberalization on income inequality using a global trade model adapted to examine the impacts on multiple households. To illustrate, we simulate the impact of several alternative bilateral and regional free trade agreements on household income and income inequality in Pakistan. The results suggest that trade liberalization does not always lead to a decline in income inequality. Moreover, a focus on reducing income inequality in the short run through trade liberalization, may not necessarily lead to the best long run outcome, for the country or for income equality.
Barry Naughton
University of California-San Diego
Fan Liu
Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
Tomoo Kikuchi
Korea University
JEL Classifications
  • D3 - Distribution
  • O5 - Economywide Country Studies