« Back to Results

Evictions and Housing Stability

Paper Session

Sunday, Jan. 6, 2019 8:00 AM - 10:00 AM

Atlanta Marriott Marquis, International 1
Hosted By: American Economic Association
  • Chair: James X. Sullivan, University of Notre Dame

The Effect of Residential Evictions on Low-Income Adults

Robert Collinson
,
New York University
Davin Reed
,
Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia

Abstract

Rising rents have increased attention to the consequences of housing instability and evictions. We assemble novel data linking housing court cases in New York City with administrative data from a number of sources and leverage the random assignment of cases to courtrooms to estimate the causal effect of evictions on homelessness, employment, earnings, public assistance receipt, and health. We find that evictions in housing court substantially increase the probability of applying to a homeless shelter and time spent in shelter. Evictions also increase the likelihood of mental hospitalizations and cause an increase in residential instability beyond the initial move-out. We find some evidence that evictions reduce quarterly earnings and employment modestly, but find no effect on receipt of public assistance.

Does Eviction Cause Poverty? Quasi-experimental Evidence from Cook County, IL

Winnie van Dijk
,
University of Chicago
John Eric Humphries
,
Yale University
Daniel Tannenbaum
,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Abstract

Each year more than two million U.S. households have an eviction case filed against them. Influential work in sociology has hypothesized that eviction is a cause, and not merely a consequence, of poverty. This paper uses the near-universe of eviction court cases in Cook County, IL for 2000-2016, linked to credit bureau and payday loans data, to provide evidence on the link between eviction and financial strain. We first provide new descriptive evidence showing that there is significant distress and an increase in demand for high interest loans in the run-up to eviction court for both evicted and non-evicted tenants. We then estimate the causal effect of an eviction order on financial strain, proxies for durable goods consumption, household moves, and neighborhood quality, leveraging the random assignment of cases to judges in eviction court for identification. The effects are small relative to the financial strain experienced by tenants in the run-up to eviction court.

Does Emergency Financial Assistance Reduce Crime?

Caroline Palmer
,
University of Notre Dame
David C. Phillips
,
University of Notre Dame
James X. Sullivan
,
University of Notre Dame

Abstract

Does emergency financial assistance reduce criminal behavior among those experiencing negative shocks? To address this question, we exploit quasi-random variation in the allocation of temporary financial assistance to eligible individuals and families that have experienced an income or housing shock. Chicago’s Homelessness Prevention Call Center (HPCC) connects such families and individuals with assistance, but the availability of funding varies unpredictably. Consequently, we can determine the impact of temporary assistance on crime by comparing outcomes for those who call when funds are available to those who call when no funds are available. Linking this call center information to arrest records from the Chicago Police Department, we find some evidence that total arrests fall between 1 and 2 years after the call. For violent crime, police arrest those referred to funds 55 percent less often than those not referred to funds. Single individuals drive this decrease. The decline in crime is related, in part, to greater housing stability—being referred to assistance significantly decreases arrests for homelessness-related, outdoor crimes such as trespassing. However, we also find that financial assistance leads to an increase in property crime arrests, which contrasts with what would be expected from a simple economic model of criminal behavior. This increase is evident for family heads, but not single individuals; the increase is mostly due to shoplifting; and the timing of this increase suggests that financial assistance enables some families to take on financial obligations that they are subsequently unable to meet. Overall, the change in the mix of crime induced by financial assistance generates considerable social benefits due to the greater social cost of violence.
Discussant(s)
Melissa Kearney
,
University of Maryland
Eric Chyn
,
University of Virginia
Gary Painter
,
University of Southern California
JEL Classifications
  • I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty
  • R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location