Portfolio Choice and Asset Allocation of Households and Long-Term Investors
Sunday, Jan. 7, 2018 10:15 AM - 12:15 PM
- Chair: Thomas Gilbert, University of Washington
Global Portfolio Diversification for Long-horizon Investors
AbstractThis paper conducts a theoretical and empirical investigation of the risk of globally diversified portfolios of stocks and bonds and of optimal intertemporal global portfolio choice for long horizon investors in the presence of permanent cash flow shocks and transitory discount rate shocks to asset values. An increase in the cross-country correlations of cash flow shocks raises the risk of a globally diversified portfolio at all horizons. By contrast, an increase in the cross-country correlations of discount rate shocks has a much more muted effect on portfolio risk at long horizons, suggesting that the benefits of global portfolio diversification to long-term investors do not recede when the source of increased global return correlations is correlated discount rates. Empirically, we document a secular increase in the cross-country correlations of both stock returns and government bond returns since the late 1990's. We identify increased correlations of discount rate shocks resulting from financial globalization as the main driver of the upward shift in stock return correlations. We also identify increased correlations of inflation shocks as an equally important source of the upward shift in bond correlations. By contrast, we don't find evidence of a secular shift in the cross-country correlations of stock market volatility shocks, which have remained fairly low through time except during the financial crisis of 2009.
Agency in Public Pension Performance
AbstractPBecause public funds are political organizations, their board members are particularly sensitive to outrage over high compensation of investment managers. High inequality between finance salaries and that of local workers raises the possibility that public funds will not contract for the highest quality managers. We model public pension boards' hiring and compensating of investment managers to achieve optimal portfolios for constituents in the presence of this and other political frictions. We then test the model in global data covering $5.6 trillion in assets. When we estimate a system of compensation and returns equations, we find that one standard deviation lower outrage coming from more local workers and public finance administrators on the board results in $80,000 more in manager compensation. In turn, we find significant excess returns from relaxing outrage constraints leads to a value add of $14-20 million per year for an average public fund, driven by 16-22 basis points excess performance in alternatives and 9-12 basis points in public equities. We confirm the prior politicization results in the literature and show that our outrage effect is orthogonal to underfunding and political pay-to-play results.
Limited Marital Commitment and Household Portfolios
AbstractThis paper examines the link between marital decisions, consumption, and optimal portfolio choice in a life-cycle model with limited marital commitment. Without full commitment, individual income shocks lead to renegotiation between spouses, altering relative bargaining power and endogenously generating time-varying risk aversion at the household-level. Consequently, changes in relative income are associated with significant shifts in household portfolios. We find strong support for this prediction using data from the PSID. The model can also rationalize the link between marital transitions and portfolio allocations observed in the data. Finally, the risk-sharing benefits of marriage imply a positive link between wealth and risky asset holdings across households.
Jules van Binsbergen,
University of Pennsylvania
University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill
University of Texas-Austin and NBER
- G1 - General Financial Markets