Political Parties Do Matter in US Cities . . . for Their Unfunded Pensions
- (pp. 33-54)
Abstract
This paper studies public sector pension obligations, the biggest fiscal challenge currently facing many US cities. Employing a regression discontinuity design around close elections, benefit payments out of a city's public sector pensions are shown to grow faster under Democratic party mayors, while contributions into the pensions do not. Previous research showed that parties do not matter for a wide range of cities' fiscal expenditures and explained this with voters imposing fiscal discipline. This paper replicates previous results but shows that parties can matter for shrouded expenditure types that voters do not pay attention to, especially if they benefit well-organized interest groups.Citation
Dippel, Christian. 2022. "Political Parties Do Matter in US Cities . . . for Their Unfunded Pensions." American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 14 (3): 33-54. DOI: 10.1257/pol.20190480Additional Materials
JEL Classification
- D72 Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- H72 State and Local Budget and Expenditures
- H75 State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
- J32 Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits; Retirement Plans; Private Pensions
- J45 Public Sector Labor Markets
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment