Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data-for-2016-0425 10/20/2021 09:34:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 02:04:AM

Project Citation: 

Li, Shengwu. Replication data for: Obviously Strategy-Proof Mechanisms. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2017. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113128V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary A strategy is obviously dominant if, for any deviation, at any information set where both strategies first diverge, the best outcome under the deviation is no better than the worst outcome under the dominant strategy. A mechanism is obviously strategy-proof (OSP) if it has an equilibrium in obviously dominant strategies. This has a behavioral interpretation: a strategy is obviously dominant if and only if a cognitively limited agent can recognize it as weakly dominant. It also has a classical interpretation: a choice rule is OSP-implementable if and only if it can be carried out by a social planner under a particular regime of partial commitment.

Scope of Project

Subject Terms:  View help for Subject Terms Randomized Control Trial; Laboratory Experiment; Mechanism Design
JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D11 Consumer Economics: Theory
      D44 Auctions
      D82 Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
Geographic Coverage:  View help for Geographic Coverage Ohio, United States
Time Period(s):  View help for Time Period(s) 2015 – 2017
Universe:  View help for Universe Students at Ohio State University
Data Type(s):  View help for Data Type(s) experimental data

Methodology

Unit(s) of Observation:  View help for Unit(s) of Observation Individuals,

Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.