The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research
Journal of Economic Perspectives
vol. 9,
no. 2, Spring 1995
(pp. 63-84)
(Complimentary)
Abstract
Social experiments have been used in research since the 1960s, yet the technique of controlled experimentation still arouses controversy among social scientists. The crucial element that distinguishes a controlled experiment from other forms of research is random assignment of treatment to the observational units of study. Because treatment differences in the sample occur as a result of random chance, the effects of the treatment on behavior can be measured with high reliability. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques and describes the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods.Citation
Burtless, Gary. 1995. "The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (2): 63-84. DOI: 10.1257/jep.9.2.63JEL Classification
- C93 Field Experiments
There are no comments for this article.
Login to Comment