This website uses cookies.

By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device to enhance site navigation and analyze site performance and traffic. For more information on our use of cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Journal of Economic Literature
  4. June 2004
  5. Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics

Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics

  • Enders
  • Gary A. Hoover
Journal of Economic Literature
vol. 42, no. 2, June 2004
(pp. 487-493)
Download Full Text PDF

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a survey regarding the instances of plagiarism reported by journal editors in the economics profession. The survey finds that nearly 24% of responding editors encounter one case of plagiarism in a typical year. In addition, the survey reveals that less than 19% of responding journals have a formal policy regarding plagiarism. Moreover, there is a great deal of variance in what is considered plagiarism and what an appropriate response to plagiarism should be. A majority of editors believe that the economics profession would benefit from a professional code of ethics.

Citation

Enders, , and Gary A. Hoover. 2004. "Whose Line Is It? Plagiarism in Economics." Journal of Economic Literature, 42 (2): 487-493. DOI: 10.1257/0022051041409066

JEL Classification

  • A14 Sociology of Economics