Name File Type Size Last Modified
  data 10/11/2019 03:57:PM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/11/2019 11:57:AM

Project Citation: 

Duflo, Esther, Dupas, Pascaline, and Kremer, Michael. Replication data for: Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2011. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/E112446V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary To the extent that students benefit from high-achieving peers, tracking will help strong students and hurt weak ones. However, all students may benefit if tracking allows teachers to better tailor their instruction level. Lower-achieving pupils are particularly likely to benefit from tracking when teachers have incentives to teach to the top of the distribution. We propose a simple model nesting these effects and test its implications in a randomized tracking experiment conducted with 121 primary schools in Kenya. While the direct effect of high-achieving peers is positive, tracking benefited lower-achieving pupils indirectly by allowing teachers to teach to their level. (JEL I21, J45, O15)

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      I21 Analysis of Education
      J45 Public Sector Labor Markets
      O15 Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.