Name File Type Size Last Modified
  P2016_1081_data 10/12/2019 11:09:AM
LICENSE.txt text/plain 14.6 KB 10/12/2019 07:09:AM

Project Citation: 

Chetty, Raj, Friedman, John N., and Rockoff, Jonah. Replication data for: Using Lagged Outcomes to Evaluate Bias in Value-Added Models. Nashville, TN: American Economic Association [publisher], 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2019-10-12. https://doi.org/10.3886/E113472V1

Project Description

Summary:  View help for Summary Value-added (VA) models measure agents' productivity based on the outcomes they produce. The utility of VA models for performance evaluation depends on the extent to which VA estimates are biased by selection. One common method of evaluating bias in VA is to test for balance in lagged values of the outcome. We show that such balance tests do not yield robust information about bias in value-added models using Monte Carlo simulations. Even unbiased VA estimates can be correlated with lagged outcomes. More generally, tests using lagged outcomes are uninformative about the degree of bias in misspecified VA models. The source of these results is that VA is itself estimated using historical data, leading to non-transparent correlations between VA and lagged outcomes.

Scope of Project

JEL Classification:  View help for JEL Classification
      D24 Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
      I21 Analysis of Education
      J24 Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity


Related Publications

Published Versions

Export Metadata

Report a Problem

Found a serious problem with the data, such as disclosure risk or copyrighted content? Let us know.

This material is distributed exactly as it arrived from the data depositor. ICPSR has not checked or processed this material. Users should consult the investigator(s) if further information is desired.