<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Recent Developments in the Econometrics of Program Evaluation</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Guido W.</gnm><snm>Imbens</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Jeffrey M.</gnm><snm>Wooldridge</snm><aff>MI State U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>5</ppf>
<ppl>86</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Many empirical questions in economics and other social sciences depend on causal
effects of programs or policies. In the last two decades, much research has been done
on the econometric and statistical analysis of such causal effects. This recent theoretical
literature has built on, and combined features of, earlier work in both the statistics
and econometrics literatures. It has by now reached a level of maturity that makes
it an important tool in many areas of empirical research in economics, including
labor economics, public finance, development economics, industrial organization,
and other areas of empirical microeconomics. In this review, we discuss some of the
recent developments. We focus primarily on practical issues for empirical researchers,
as well as provide a historical overview of the area and give references to more
technical research.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.5</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.5</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1</ppf>
<ppl>4</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.1</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.1</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Healthy, Wealthy, and Wise: Socioeconomic Status, Poor Health in Childhood, and Human Capital Development</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Janet</gnm><snm>Currie</snm><aff>Columbia U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>87</ppf>
<ppl>122</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>There are many possible pathways between parental education, income, and health,
and between child health and education, but only some of them have been explored in
the literature. This essay focuses on links between parental socioeconomic status (as
measured by education, income, occupation, or in some cases area of residence) and
child health, and between child health and adult education or income. Specifically,
I ask two questions: What is the evidence regarding whether parental socioeconomic
status affects child health? And, what is the evidence relating child health to future
educational and labor market outcomes? I show that there is now strong evidence of
both links, suggesting that health could play a role in the intergenerational transmission
of economic status.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.87</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.87</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Age of Milton Friedman</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Andrei</gnm><snm>Shleifer</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>123</ppf>
<ppl>35</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Between 1980 and 2005, as the world embraced free market policies, living standards
rose sharply, while life expectancy, educational attainment, and democracy
improved and absolute poverty declined. Is this a coincidence? A collection of essays
edited by Balcerowicz and Fischer argues that indeed reliance on free market forces
is key to economic growth. A book by Stiglitz and others disagrees. I review and compare
the two arguments.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.123</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.123</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Globalization and the Welfare State: A Review of Hans-Werner Sinn's <em>Can Germany Be Saved?</em></ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Dennis J.</gnm><snm>Snower</snm><aff>Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Christian-Albrechts U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Alessio J. G.</gnm><snm>Brown</snm><aff>Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Christian-Albrechts U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Christian</gnm><snm>Merkl</snm><aff>Kiel Institute for the World Economy and Christian-Albrechts U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>136</ppf>
<ppl>58</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>What are the challenges that globalization makes on welfare states and how should
welfare states respond? How should welfare states be designed to enable countries to
reap the benefits of globalization? These are the main themes of Hans-Werner Sinn's
book, Can Germany Be Saved? We view Germany as a case study of how a welfare state
can go wrong in reacting to the pressures of globalization. We present two views of globalization -- 
the "specialization view" (of Sinn) and the "Great Reorganization view"
(ours) -- and examine the policy implications of each for the welfare state design.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.136</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.136</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>What Do (and Don't) We Know about the Value Added Tax? A Review of Richard M. Bird and Pierre-Pascal Gendron's <em>The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries</em></ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Michael</gnm><snm>Keen</snm><aff>IMF</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>159</ppf>
<ppl>70</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>The VAT has taken the tax world by storm over the last fifty years, but left little trace
in the academic literature. Bird and Gendron provide an impressively informed and
informative account of the VAT experience in lower income countries, largely vindicating
the tax and standard advice for its design. But they rightly stress too that
dominant "expert opinion" on the VAT remains troublingly uninformed by serious
analysis and evidence. This article focuses on some of these gaps and recent attempts
to start filling them.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.159</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.159</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Book Reviews</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>171</ppf>
<ppl>218</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.171</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.171</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Annotated Listing of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>219</ppf>
<ppl>295</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.219</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.219</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=1</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>JEL Classification System</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>298</ppf>
<ppl>311</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.1.298</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.1.298</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>



