<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Economic Forecasting</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Graham</gnm><snm>Elliott</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Allan</gnm><snm>Timmermann</snm><aff>U CA, San Diego and CREATES</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>3</ppf>
<ppl>56</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Forecasts guide decisions in all areas of economics and finance and their value can
only be understood in relation to, and in the context of, such decisions. We discuss
the central role of the loss function in helping determine the forecaster's objectives.
Decision theory provides a framework for both the construction and evaluation of
forecasts. This framework allows an understanding of the challenges that arise from
the explosion in the sheer volume of predictor variables under consideration and the
forecaster's ability to entertain an endless array of forecasting models and time-varying
specifications, none of which may coincide with the "true" model. We show this
along with reviewing methods for comparing the forecasting performance of pairs
of models or evaluating the ability of the best of many models to beat a benchmark
specification.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=1&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.3</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>What Do We Know about Global Income Inequality?</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Sudhir</gnm><snm>Anand</snm><aff>U Oxford and Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Paul</gnm><snm>Segal</snm><aff>U Oxford</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>57</ppf>
<ppl>94</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In this paper, we review the recent literature on global interpersonal income inequality.
While all estimates agree that the level is very high, with a Gini of between 0.630
and 0.686 in the 1990s, there is no consensus regarding the direction of change. We
discuss methodological issues, including the use of national accounts versus survey-
based estimates of mean income (or consumption) and the choice of purchasing
power parity exchange rates. Findings of a rise or fall in global income inequality are
not robust across different estimation methods and datasets. Given the diversity of
estimates and various sources of uncertainty, including gaps and errors in the underlying
data, we conclude there is insufficient evidence to determine the direction of
change in global interpersonal inequality in recent decades.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=2&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.57</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Relative Income, Happiness, and Utility: An Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Andrew E.</gnm><snm>Clark</snm><aff>Paris School of Economics and IZA</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Paul</gnm><snm>Frijters</snm><aff>Queensland U Technology</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Michael A.</gnm><snm>Shields</snm><aff>U Melbourne</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>95</ppf>
<ppl>144</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>The well-known Easterlin paradox points out that average happiness has remained
constant over time despite sharp rises in GNP per head. At the same time, a micro
literature has typically found positive correlations between individual income and
individual measures of subjective well-being. This paper suggests that these two findings
are consistent with the presence of relative income terms in the utility function.
Income may be evaluated relative to others (social comparison) or to oneself in the
past (habituation). We review the evidence on relative income from the subjective
well-being literature. We also discuss the relation (or not) between happiness and
utility, and discuss some nonhappiness research (behavioral, experimental, neurological)
related to income comparisons. We last consider how relative income in
the utility function can affect economic models of behavior in the domains of consumption,
investment, economic growth, savings, taxation, labor supply, wages, and
migration.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=3&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.95</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Review of Janos Kornai</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Gerard</gnm><snm>Roland</snm><aff>U CA, Berkeley</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>145</ppf>
<ppl>50</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This article reviews the memoirs of János Kornai. The famous Hungarian economist
describes his life experiences and the concurrent history of Hungary. More importantly,
he leads us through his intellectual evolution, explaining how his thinking
evolved, how it was influenced by events, how one research question led to another.
This brings alive the intellectual and historical developments that led to Kornai's
work on socialist incentives, on the theory of planning, on the economics of shortage,
and on the transition from socialism to capitalism. The book takes us on a journey
that encompasses large elements of the history of economic thought in the second half
of the twentieth century, as well as the history of Central Europe.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=4&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.145</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Book Reviews</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>151</ppf>
<ppl>93</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=5&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.151</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Annotated Listing of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>194</ppf>
<ppl>268</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=6&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.194</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>46</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2008</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&issue_date=March 2008</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>JEL Classification System for Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>269</ppf>
<ppl>281</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=46&issue=1&article=7&issue_date=March 2008</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.46.1.269</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


