Journal of Economic Perspectives
Vol. 14, No. 3, Summer 2000
Contents
The Political Economy of the Budget Surplus in the
United States
Alberto Alesina 3-19
Reassessing Discretionary Fiscal Policy
John B. Taylor 21-36
The Significance of Federal Taxes as Automatic Stabilizers
Alan J. Auerbach and Daniel Feenberg 37-56
Should America Save for its Old Age? Fiscal Policy,
Population Aging, and National saving
Douglas W. Elmendorf and Louise M. Sheiner 57-74
The Sports Business as a Labor Market Laboratory
Lawrence M. Kahn 75-94
The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their Communities
John Siegfried and Andrew Zimbalist 95-114
Economic Analysis of Social Interactions
Charles F. Manski 115-136
Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms
Elinor Ostrom 137-158
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter 159-181
Vickrey Auctions in Practice: From Nineteenth-Century
Philately to Twenty-First-Century E-Commerce
David Lucking-Reiley 183-192
In Honor of Kevin M. Murphy: Winner of the John Bates
Clark Medal
Finis Welch 193-204
Policy Watch: The Tyranny of Budget Forecasts
J.D. Foster and James C. Miller III 205-215
History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments,
and Paths of Development in the New World
Kenneth L. Sokoloff and Stanley L. Engerman 217-232
Features:
Recommendations for Further Reading 225-232
Correspondence 233-239
Notes 241-244
The Political Economy of the Budget Surplus in the United States
Alberto Alesina
Current surpluses in the U.S. have been achieved by a combination of
a strong economy, low interest rates, and sharp cuts in defense spending.
These surpluses follow a period (the 1980s) of rather exceptional budget
deficit. This paper investigates the origin, size, and expected future
patterns of the U.S. budget balance. It discusses how different political
forces may generate alternative fiscal scenarios for the U.S. in the next
decade.
View article
in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Reassessing Discretionary Fiscal Policy
John B. Taylor
Recent changes in policy research and
in policy-making call for a reassessment of countercyclical fiscal policy.
Such a reassessment indicates that countercyclical fiscal policy should
focus on automatic stabilizers rather than discretionary actions. Monetary
policy has been reacting more systematically to output and inflation;
long expansions in the 1980s and 1990s demonstrate policy effectiveness.
It is unlikely that discretionary countercyclical fiscal policy could
improve things, even with less uncertainty about fiscal impacts. A discretionary
countercyclical fiscal policy could make monetary policy-making more difficult.
Discretionary fiscal policy should focus on long-run issues, such as tax
reform and social security reform.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
The Significance of Federal Taxes as Automatic Stabilizers
Alan J. Auerbach and Daniel Feenberg 37-56
Using the TAXSIM model for the period 1962-95, we consider the federal
tax system's impact as an automatic stabilizer. Despite the many changes
in the tax system, there has been relatively little change in its role
as an automatic stabilizer. We estimate that individual federal taxes
offset perhaps as much as 8 percent of initial shocks to GDP. We also
suggest that the progressive income tax may help to stabilize output via
its effect on the supply of labor, an additional effect that may even
be of similar magnitude to the more traditional path of stabilization
through aggregate demand.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Should America Save for its Old Age? Fiscal Policy, Population Aging, and
National saving
Douglas W. Elmendorf and Louise M. Sheiner 57-74
We examine whether the aging of the U.S. population adds force to traditional
arguments for boosting national saving and conclude - perhaps surprisingly
- that it may not. Aging boosts the demands on future resources, but it
also changes the rate of return the U.S. economy can expect from saving.
We find that the net effect on desired saving is small: some specifications
imply that present consumption should fall by a fraction of 1 percent;
others imply that consumption should actually increase. Thus, it is optimal
to allow future cohorts to bear much/all of the burden of population aging.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
The Sports Business as a Labor Market Laboratory
Lawrence M. Kahn 75-94
With superior data on compensation and productivity, as well as the
occurrence of abrupt, dramatic market structure and player allocation
rules changes, sports labor markets offer an excellent setting in which
to test economic hypotheses. This paper reviews evidence from sports in
four areas: employer monopsony, discrimination, the Coase Theorem, and
incentive contracts, supervision and performance. There is considerable
evidence of monopsony as well as for the existence of some forms of discrimination
against minority athletes. Incentive contracts have strong effects on
player performance and behavior, and there is mixed evidence on the predictions
of the Coase Theorem.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their Communities
John Siegfried and Andrew Zimbalist 95-114
Since the 1950s, taxpayers have been the primary investors in stadia
built for the use of privately-owned professional sports teams. Team owners
have argued that sports facilities boost local economic activity; however,
economic reasoning and empirical evidence suggest the opposite. Public
support for stadia is also driven by demand for community image, and owners
of sports teams supply a scarce input into image enhancement--participation
in the major league--for which they have been able to extract monopoly
rents from dispersed taxpayers. We suggest reforms to dissipate the monopoly
sports leagues exercise when negotiating with host communities for their
teams.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Economic Analysis of Social Interactions
Charles F. Manski
Economics is broadening its scope from analysis of markets to study
of general social interactions. Developments in game theory, the economics
of the family, and endogenous growth theory have led the way. Economists
have also performed new empirical research using observational data on
social interactions, but with much less to show. The fundamental problem
is that observable outcomes may be generated by many different interaction
processes, so empirical findings are open to a wide variety of interpretations.
To make sustained progress, empirical research will need richer data,
including experiments in controlled environments and subjective data on
preferences and expectations.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms
Elinor Ostrom
I assume multiple types of players-"rational egoists," as well as "conditional
cooperators" and "willing punishers"-in models of nonmarket behavior.
I use an indirect evolutionary approach to explain how multiple types
of players could survive and flourish in social dilemma situations. Contextual
variables that enhance knowledge about past behavior assist in explaining
the origin of collective action. Among the important contextual variables
are types of goods, types of groups, and rules that groups use to provide
and allocate goods. Finally, I reexamine a series of design principles
that were derived earlier from an examination of extensive case materials.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity
Ernst Fehr and Simon Gächter 159-181
This paper shows that reciprocity has powerful implications for many
economic domains. It is an important determinant in the enforcement of
contracts and social norms and enhances the possibilities of collective
action greatly. Reciprocity may render the provision of explicit incentive
inefficient because the incentives may crowd out voluntary co-operation.
It strongly limits the effects of competition in markets with incomplete
contracts and gives rise to noncompetitive wage differences. Finally,
reciprocity it is also a strong force contributing to the existence of
incomplete contracts.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Vickrey Auctions in Practice: From Nineteenth-Century Philately to Twenty-First-Century
E-Commerce
David Lucking-Reiley
William Vickrey (1961) proposed an auction mechanism in which bidders
submit sealed bids, and the highest bidder wins the good in return for
payment of the second-highest bid amount. For decades, economists have
credited Vickrey with inventing this auction format, and have believed
that the Vickrey auction is rarely used in practice. This paper presents
evidence that Vickrey auctions have long been the predominant auction
format for mail sales of collectible postage stamps. Stamp auctioneers
developed this auction format on their own, as early as 1893, even before
Vickrey was born.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
In Honor of Kevin M. Murphy: Winner of the John Bates Clark Medal
Finis Welch 193-204
No abstract available.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Policy Watch: The Tyranny of Budget Forecasts
J.D. Foster and James C. Miller III 205-215
The evolving federal budget process has placed increasing demands on,
and given unique powers to, the economic forecasters at OMB, Treasury,
CBO, and the Joint Tax Committee of Congress. On the whole, the forecasters
have been highly professional in their work, but differences in estimating
techniques and, especially, constraints imposed on their analysis by elected
officials have limited their credibility. Both the Administration and
Congress "game" the system and even ignore the budget rules when convenient.
Thus, a sophisticated budget process can help, but cannot assure, sound
fiscal policy in the absence of political will to make hard decisions.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
History Lessons: Institutions, Factor Endowments, and Paths of Development
in the New World
Kenneth L. Sokoloff and Stanley L. Engerman
The explanations offered for the contrasting records of long-run growth
and development among the societies of North and South America most often
focus on institutions. The traditional explanations for the sources
of these differences in institutions, typically highlight the significance
of national heritage or religion. We, in contrast, argue that a hemispheric
perspective across the wide range of colonies established in the New World
by the Europeans suggests that although there were many influences, factor
endowments or initial conditions had profound and enduring effects on
the long-run paths of institutional and economic development followed
by the respective economies.
View
article in pdf format (AEA members only)
Sign up for e-JEP
Features (view in pdf format):
Recommendations
for Further Reading (AEA members only)
Correction (AEA
members only)
Notes
Back
to Contents
|