


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>i</ppf>
<ppl>iv</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.i</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.i</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Macroeconomic Costs and Benefits of the EMU and Other Monetary Unions: An Overview of Recent Research</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Roel</gnm><snm>Beetsma</snm><aff>U Amsterdam and CESifo, Munich</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Massimo</gnm><snm>Giuliodori</snm><aff>U Amsterdam</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>603</ppf>
<ppl>41</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This article provides an overview of recent research into the macroeconomic costs and benefits of monetary unification. We are primarily interested in Europe's monetary
union. Given that unification entails the loss of a policy instrument, its potential benefits have to be found elsewhere. Unification may serve as a vehicle for beneficial institutional changes. In particular, it may be a route toward an independent monetary
policy, which alleviates the scope for political pressure to relax monetary policy. Unification also eliminates harmful monetary policy spillovers and competitive devaluations. We explore how disagreement between the monetary and fiscal authorities about their policy objectives can lead to extreme macroeconomic outcomes. Further, we pay considerable attention to the desirability (or not) of fiscal constraints and fiscal coordination in a monetary union. Monetary commitment and fiscal free riding play a key role in this regard. Similar free-riding issues also feature prominently in the
analysis of how unification influences structural reforms. We end with a brief discussion of monetary unification outside Europe. The cost-benefit trade-off of unification may differ substantially between industrialized and less-developed countries, where
differences in fiscal needs and, hence, the reliance on seigniorage revenues may dominate the scope for unification.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.603</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.603</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Services Trade and Policy</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Joseph</gnm><snm>Francois</snm><aff>Johannes Kepler U Linz</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Bernard</gnm><snm>Hoekman</snm><aff>World Bank</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>642</ppf>
<ppl>92</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>A substantial body of research has taken shape on trade in services since the mid-1980s. Much of this is inspired by the WTO and regional trade agreements. However, an increasing number of papers focus on the impacts of unilateral services sector liberalization. The literature touches on important linkages between trade and FDI in services and the general pattern of productivity growth and economic development. This paper surveys the literature on services trade, focusing on contributions that investigate
the determinants of international trade and investment in services, the potential gains from greater trade, and efforts to cooperate to achieve such liberalization through trade agreements. There is increasing evidence that services liberalization is
a major potential source of gains in economic performance, including productivity in manufacturing and the coordination of activities both between and within firms. The performance of service sectors, and thus services policies, may also be an important
determinant of trade volumes, the distributional effects of trade, and overall patterns of economic growth and development. At the same time, services trade is also a source of increasing political unease about the impacts of globalization on labor markets, linked to worries about offshoring and the potential pressure this places on wages in high income countries.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.642</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.642</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Orazio P.</gnm><snm>Attanasio</snm><aff>U College London and IFS, London</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Guglielmo</gnm><snm>Weber</snm><aff>U Padova and IFS, London</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>693</ppf>
<ppl>751</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper provides a critical survey of the large literature on the life cycle model of consumption, both from an empirical and a theoretical point of view. It discusses several approaches that have been taken in the literature to bring the model to the data, their empirical successes, and their failures. Finally, the paper reviews a number of changes to the standard life cycle model that could help solve the remaining empirical puzzles.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.693</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.693</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Articles</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>A Review of Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast's Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Robert</gnm><snm>Bates</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>752</ppf>
<ppl>56</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>In <em>Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History</em>, Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast probe the organizational foundations of development. Outlining the properties of the "natural" and "open entry" societies, they highlight as well the conditions under which societies can move from one to the other, thereby achieving political order and
economic prosperity.</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.752</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.752</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Book Reviews</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Book Reviews</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>757</ppf>
<ppl>788</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.757</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.757</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Annotated Listing of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>789</ppf>
<ppl>882</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.789</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.789</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>48</vol>
<iss>3</iss>
<cd>September 2010</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=48&issue=3</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>JEL Classification System</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>883</ppf>
<ppl>896</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.48.3.883</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.48.3.883</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


