<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>The Wealth of Cities: Agglomeration Economies and Spatial Equilibrium in the United States</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Edward L.</gnm><snm>Glaeser</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
<au><gnm>Joshua D.</gnm><snm>Gottlieb</snm><aff>Harvard U</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>983</ppf>
<ppl>1028</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Empirical research on cities starts with a spatial equilibrium condition: workers and
firms are assumed to be indifferent across space. This condition implies that research
on cities is different from research on countries, and that work on places within
countries needs to consider population, income, and housing prices simultaneously.
Housing supply elasticity will determine whether urban success reveals itself in the
form of more people or higher incomes. Urban economists generally accept the existence
of agglomeration economies, which exist when productivity rises with density,
but estimating the magnitude of those economies is difficult. Some manufacturing
firms cluster to reduce the costs of moving goods, but this force no longer appears to
be important in driving urban success. Instead, modern cities are far more dependent
on the role that density can play in speeding the fl ow of ideas. Finally, urban
economics has some insights to offer related topics such as growth theory, national
income accounts, public economics, and housing prices. (JEL R11, R23, R31, R32)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.983</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.983</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Beyond GDP: The Quest for a Measure of Social Welfare</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Marc</gnm><snm>Fleurbaey</snm><aff>U Paris V, Rene Descartes and CORE, Catholic U Louvain</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1029</ppf>
<ppl>75</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This paper critically examines the various approaches to the measurement of individual
well-being and social welfare that have been considered for the construction of
alternatives to GDP. Special attention is devoted to recent developments in the analysis
of sustainability, in the study of happiness, in the theory of social choice and fair allocation,
and in the capability approach. It is suggested in the conclusion that, although
convergence toward a consensual approach is not impossible, for the moment not one
but three alternatives to GDP are worth developing. ( JEL I31, E23, E01)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1029</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1029</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Law and Finance "at the Origin"</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Ulrike</gnm><snm>Malmendier</snm><aff>U CA, Berkeley</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1076</ppf>
<ppl>1108</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>What are the key determinants of financial development and growth? A large literature
debates the relative importance of countries' legal and political environment. In
this paper, I present evidence from ancient Rome, where an early form of shareholder
company, the societas publicanorum, developed. I show that the societas publicanorum
flourished in a legally underdeveloped but politically supportive environment
(Roman Republic) and disappeared when Roman law reached its height of legal
sophistication but the political environment grew less supportive (Roman Empire). In
the Roman case, legal development appears to have mattered little as long as the law
as practiced was flexible and adapted to economic needs. The "law as practiced," in
turn, reflected prevalent political interests. After discussing parallels in more recent
history, I provide a brief overview of the literature on law and finance and on politics
and finance. The historical evidence suggests that legal systems may be less of a
technological constraint for growth than previously thought -- at least "at the origin."
(JEL D72, K10, N23, N43)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1076</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1076</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Learning from Schelling's Strategy of Conflict</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Roger B.</gnm><snm>Myerson</snm><aff>U Chicago</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1109</ppf>
<ppl>25</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Thomas Schelling's Strategy of Conflict is a masterpiece that should be recognized as
one of the most important and influential books in social theory. This paper reviews
some of the important ideas in Strategy of Conflict and considers some of the broader
impact that this book has had on game theory, economics, and social theory. By
his emphasis on the critical importance of information and commitment in strategic
dynamics, Schelling played a vital role in stimulating the development of noncooperative
game theory. More broadly, Schelling's analysis of games with multiple
equilibria has redefined the scope of economics and its place in the social sciences.
(JEL D74, F51, H56)</ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1109</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1109</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Book Reviews</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1126</ppf>
<ppl>60</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1126</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1126</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Front Matter</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>977</ppf>
<ppl>980</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.977</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.977</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Annotated Listing of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1161</ppf>
<ppl>1256</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1161</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1161</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>JEL Classification System</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1257</ppf>
<ppl>1270</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1257</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1257</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Doctoral Dissertations in Economics</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1271</ppf>
<ppl>1298</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1271</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1271</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>General Index for Volume XLVII</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1299</ppf>
<ppl>1306</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1299</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1299</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>47</vol>
<iss>4</iss>
<cd>December 2009</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/issue.php?journal=JEL&volume=47&issue=4</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Index of Authors of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>1307</ppf>
<ppl>1335</ppl>
</pp>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.47.4.1307</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/jel.47.4.1307</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


