<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Daron</gnm><snm>Acemoglu</snm><aff>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>7</ppf>
<ppl>72</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This essay discusses the effect of technical change on wage inequality. I argue that the behavior of wages and returns to schooling indicates that technical change has been skill-biased during the past sixty years. Furthermore, the recent increase in inequality is most likely due to an acceleration in skill bias. In contrast to twentieth-century developments, much of the technical change during the early nineteenth century appears to be skill-replacing. I suggest that this is because the increased supply of unskilled workers in the English cities made the introduction of these technologies profitable. On the other hand, the twentieth century has been characterized by skill-biased technical change because the rapid increase in the supply of skilled workers has induced the development of skill-complementary technologies. The recent acceleration in skill bias is in turn likely to have been a response to the acceleration in the supply of skills during the past several decades. </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=1&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051026976</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Delegated Monitors, Large and Small: Germany's Banking System, 1800&ndash;1914</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Timothy W.</gnm><snm>Guinnane</snm><aff>Department of Economics, Yale University</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>73</ppf>
<ppl>124</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Banks play a greater role in the German financial system than in those of the United States or Britain. Germany's large universal banks are admired by those who advocate bank deregulation in the United States. Others admire the universal banks for their supposed role in corporate governance and industrial finance. Many discussions distort the German banking system by overstressing one of several types of banks, and ignore the competition and cooperation between the famous universal banks and other banking groups. Tracing the historical development of the German banking system from the early nineteenth century places the large universal banks in context. </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=2&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051026985</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Looking Inside the Labor Market: A Review Article</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Peter</gnm><snm>Howitt</snm><aff>Brown University</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>125</ppf>
<ppl>138</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>When unemployed workers are available, why don't firms cut wages until the excess supply is eliminated? In his book, Why Wages Don't Fall During a Recession, Truman F. Bewley concludes, based on interviews with managers and labor leaders, that the most important factor inhibiting wage cuts is the psychological factor of morale. Bewley's field research has made an outstanding contribution to our knowledge of labor markets, by providing a close-up view of exactly what happens from the vantage point of the participants. </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=3&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051026994</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Can We Trust Social Capital?</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>Joel</gnm><snm>Sobel</snm><aff>Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>139</ppf>
<ppl>154</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>This essay looks at the literature on social capital from the perspective of game theory. It reviews Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam and Social Capital: A Multifaceted Approach edited by Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldin. </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=4&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051027001</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Review of Skidelsky's John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Britain</ti>
<augp>
<au><gnm>J. Bradford</gnm><snm>Delong</snm><aff>University of California, Berkeley and NBER</aff></au>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>155</ppf>
<ppl>162</ppl>
</pp>
<ab>Skidelsky's three-volume biography of Keynes, of which this is the third, gives us Keynes, entire. The meat of the biography lies in the well-constructed narrative and in the magnificent portraits of Keynes and his age. Robert Skidelsky has given us a superb intellectual biography. </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=5&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051027010</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Book Reviews</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>163</ppf>
<ppl>226</ppl>
</pp>
<ab> </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=6&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051027029</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>Annotated Listing of New Books</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>227</ppf>
<ppl>331</ppl>
</pp>
<ab> </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=7&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051027038</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


<head>
<pubinfo>
<pubnm>American Economic Association</pubnm>
<publoc>Nashville, TN</publoc>
</pubinfo>
<jrninfo>
<issn>0022-8282</issn>
<jrnti>Journal of Economic Literature</jrnti>
<jrnurl>http://www.aeaweb.org/journal.html</jrnurl>
</jrninfo>
<issinfo>
<vol>40</vol>
<iss>1</iss>
<cd>March 2002</cd>
<iss_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/issue_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&issue_date=March 2002</iss_url>
</issinfo>
<docty>Journal Article</docty>
<artinfo>
<ti>JEL Classification System</ti>
<augp>
</augp>
<pp>
<ppf>332</ppf>
<ppl>343</ppl>
</pp>
<ab> </ab>
<art_url>http://www.aeaweb.org/articles/article_detail.php?journal=JEL&volume=40&issue=1&article=8&issue_date=March 2002</art_url>
<doi>10.1257/0022051027047</doi>
</artinfo>
</head>


