Finance and Politics: A Review Essay Based on Kenneth Dam's Analysis of Legal Traditions in The Law-Growth Nexus

Roe, Mark J.; Siegel, Jordan I.

AEAweb: Journal Article Full-Text Access

Note to Institutional Subscribers: If you normally access AEAweb journal content via your university or firm's subscription and receive this page, please click here. The most likely causes of this are a recently changed IP address, a new subscription, or the renewal of a lapsed institutional subscription. This page will stop appearing on the next synchronisation of the document delivery and authentication systems.

You may also click here for pay-per-view, Athens login and other access options .

AEA Members, please click the button below to access the login form:

Roe, Mark J., and Jordan I. Siegel. 2009. "Finance and Politics: A Review Essay Based on Kenneth Dam's Analysis of Legal Traditions in The Law-Growth Nexus." , 47(3): 781-800.

Show Article Details

DOI: 10.1257/jel.47.3.781

Abstract:Strong financial markets are widely thought to propel economic development, with many in finance seeing legal tradition as fundamental to protecting investors sufficiently for finance to flourish. Kenneth Dam finds that the legal tradition view inaccurately portrays how legal systems work, how laws developed historically, and how government power is allocated in the various legal traditions. Yet, after probing the legal origins' literature for inaccuracies, Dam does not deeply develop an alternative hypothesis to explain the world's differences in financial development. Nor does he challenge the origins core data, which could be origins' trump card. Hence, his analysis will not convince many economists, despite that his legal learning suggests conceptual and factual difficulties for the legal origins explanations. Yet, a dense political economy explanation is already out there and the origins-based data has unexplored weaknesses consistent with Dam's contentions. Knowing if the origins view is truly fundamental, flawed, or secondary is vital for financial development policy making because policymakers who believe it will pick policies that imitate what they think to be the core institutions of the preferred legal tradition. But if they have mistaken views, as Dam indicates they might, as to what the legal traditions' institutions really are and which types of laws are effective, or what is really most important to financial development, they will make policy mistakes -- potentially serious ones.

Authors:
Roe, Mark J. (Harvard U)
Siegel, Jordan I. (Harvard U)

JEL Classifications:
E23: Macroeconomics: Production
H11: Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
K10: Basic Areas of Law: General (Constitutional Law)
K40: Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior: General
N40: Economic History: Government, War, Law, and Regulation: General, International, or Comparative
O17: Formal and Informal Sectors; Shadow Economy; Institutional Arrangements
O40: Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity: General

If you are an AEA member and do not have an AEAweb login, please click here.

If you would like to become an AEA member, please see our membership page.

If you arrived at this page via a journal article link, you will be redirected to the pdf after successful login.

If your first login attempt fails, and you have recently signed up for access or have recently changed your password, you may need to wait a few moments and try again.

Please contact us at notify@aeaweb.org with any problems or questions.

Contents of Current Issues

April 2013 AEJ: Macro

April 2013 AEJ: Applied

March 2013 JEL

Virtual Field Journals

In the News:

The Huffington Post reports on a study addressing the influence of lifestyle factors on shrinking height in the elderly published in the April issue of AEJ: Applied Economics.

Michael Frakes' (Cornell Law School) article on medical liability standards from the February issue of the American Economic Review was discussed as part of a Bloomberg opinion piece on medical malpractice.

Slate Magazine recently discussed former AEA president, George Akerlof's classic behavioral research and a 2012 American Economic Review study conducted by German and Swiss researchers to explore how gifting can motivate some employees more than cash incentives do in the workplace.