AEAweb: Journal Article Full-Text Access
Note to Institutional Subscribers: If you normally access AEAweb journal content via your university or firm's subscription and receive this page, please click
here. The most likely causes of this are a recently changed IP address, a new subscription, or the renewal of a lapsed institutional subscription. This page will stop appearing on the next synchronisation of the document delivery and authentication systems.
You may also click here for pay-per-view, Athens login and other access options .
AEA Members, please click the button below to access the login form:
Mookherjee, Dilip. 2006. "Decentralization, Hierarchies, and Incentives: A Mechanism Design Perspective."
,
44(2): 367-390.
Show Article Details
DOI: 10.1257/jel.44.2.367
Abstract:Separation of ownership from management, multidivisional firm organizations, delegation
of production decisions to worker teams, delegation of pricing and advertising decisions to
retail franchisers, reliance on intermediaries in trade or finance, and distribution of regulatory
authority across different agencies represent examples of organizations that delegate
and distribute decision-making authority instead of centralizing it. This paper reviews literature
on costs and benefits of delegated decision making in hierarchical organizations or
contracting networks with regard to problems of incentives and coordination. It starts by
describing incentive and coordination costs of delegation in simple canonical examples of
hierarchies where both information and incentives of different decisionmakers differ. One
class of models pertain to contexts where the classical Revelation Principle applies, i.e.,
where costs of contractual complexity, information processing, or communication are
absent, agents do not collude, and the mechanism designer can commit to the mechanism.
Delegation may conceivably entail a loss of control and coordination arising from the divergence
of information and incentives. Sufficient and necessary conditions for this loss to be
mitigated entirely include risk neutrality, top-down contracting, and monitoring of transfers
or production assignments between subordinates. The next class of models introduces
communication costs that restrict the performance of centralized arrangements relative to
delegation owing to a resulting loss of flexibility, which has to be traded off against possible
control losses of delegation. Finally, consequences of collusion among agents is discussed,
which typically enlarge the range of circumstances under which delegation can attain optimal
second-best outcomes. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relevance of this
theoretical literature to recently emerging empirical studies of industrial organizations
where delegated decision making plays an important role: adoption of innovative human
resource management practices, new information technologies and retail franchising.
Authors:
Mookherjee, Dilip
JEL Classifications:
D23: Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
L12: Monopoly; Monopolization Strategies
M12: Personnel Management; executive compensation
M54: Personnel Economics: Labor Management
If you are an AEA member and do not have an AEAweb login, please
click here.
If you would like to become an AEA member, please see our
membership page.
If you arrived at this page via a journal article link, you will be redirected to the pdf after successful login.
If your first login attempt fails, and you have recently signed up for access or have recently changed your password, you may need to wait a few moments and try again.
Please contact us at
notify@aeaweb.org with any problems or questions.
Contents of Current Issues
May 2013 AER
Spring 2013 JEP
May 2013 AEJ: Policy
May 2013 AEJ: Micro
April 2013 AEJ: Macro
April 2013 AEJ: Applied
March 2013 JEL
Virtual Field Journals
In the News:
The Huffington Post reports on a study addressing the influence of lifestyle factors on shrinking height in the elderly published in the April issue of AEJ: Applied Economics.
Michael Frakes' (Cornell Law School) article on medical liability standards from the February issue of the American Economic Review was discussed as part of a Bloomberg opinion piece on medical malpractice.
Slate Magazine recently discussed former AEA president, George Akerlof's classic behavioral research and a 2012 American Economic Review study conducted by German and Swiss researchers to explore how gifting can motivate some employees more than cash incentives do in the workplace.
Contact Us