Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 8 No. 1 (Winter 1994)
Print Article Summary Export Citation
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Facts and Myths about Refereeing
Hamermesh, Daniel S. 1994. "Facts and Myths about Refereeing." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1): 153-163.
Referees' and editors' behavior is illustrated by data from a random sample of refereeing requests by seven economics journals. Referees tend to be higher-quality (better-cited, prime-age) than authors. Except for a few superstar authors, there is no matching of authors and referees by quality. Nearly 80 percent of those asked to referee do so, with a median completion time of less than two months. Except for a few very slow referees and another few who promise but fail to accomplish the task, the slow editorial process is not due to referees' behavior. Paying referees speeds the job, mainly by speeding up those who would barely not qualify for the fee.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Hamermesh, Daniel S. (U TX and NBER)
A14: Sociology of Economics
| Login to post a comment