This setting lets you change the way you view articles. You can choose to have articles open in a dialog window, a new tab, or directly in the same window.
Open in Dialog
Open in New Tab
Open in same window
Open in New Tab
Open in same window

Journal of Economic Perspectives: Vol. 25 No. 2 (Spring 2011)
JEP Volume. 25, Issue 2 |
Previous ArticleNext Article
Sign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment
Previous ArticleNext Article
Expand
Quick Tools:
Print Article Summary Email Link to this Article Export CitationSign up for Email Alerts Follow us on Twitter
Explore:
The Minimum Legal Drinking Age and Public Health
Article Citation
Carpenter, Christopher, and
Carlos Dobkin. 2011. "The Minimum Legal Drinking Age and Public Health."
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
25(2): 133-56.
DOI: 10.1257/jep.25.2.133
DOI: 10.1257/jep.25.2.133
Abstract
The Amethyst Initiative, signed by more than 100 college presidents and other higher education officials calls for a reexamination of the minimum legal drinking age in the United States. A central argument of the initiative is that the U.S. minimum legal drinking age policy results in more dangerous drinking than would occur if the legal drinking age were lower. A companion organization called Choose Responsibility explicitly proposes "a series of changes that will allow 18-20 year-olds to purchase, possess and consume alcoholic beverages." Does the age-21 drinking limit in the United States reduce alcohol consumption by young adults and its harms, or as the signatories of the Amethyst Initiative contend, is it "not working"? In this paper, we summarize a large and compelling body of empirical evidence which shows that one of the central claims of the signatories of the Amethyst Initiative is incorrect: setting the minimum legal drinking age at 21 clearly reduces alcohol consumption and its major harms. We use a panel fixed effects approach and a regression discontinuity approach to estimate the effects of the minimum legal drinking age on mortality, and we also discuss what is known about the relationship between the minimum legal drinking age and other adverse outcomes such as nonfatal injury and crime. We document the effect of the minimum legal drinking age on alcohol consumption and estimate the costs of adverse alcohol-related events on a per-drink basis. Finally we consider implications for the correct choice of a minimum legal drinking age.
Article Full-Text Access
Full-text Article (Complimentary)
Authors
Carpenter, Christopher (U CA, Irvine)
Dobkin, Carlos (U CA, Santa Cruz)
Dobkin, Carlos (U CA, Santa Cruz)
JEL Classifications
I12: Health Production
I18: Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
H75: State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
J13: Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
I18: Health: Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
H75: State and Local Government: Health; Education; Welfare; Public Pensions
J13: Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
Comments
View Comments on This Article (0) | Login to post a comment

